Data type classes definitions - WormBase/textpresso_classifiers GitHub Wiki
Definition of "positive" class - which characteristics must a paper have to be classified as positive?
A paper must report experimental results describing catalytic (i.e. enzymatic) activity for a gene product.
(Guess or criteria going forward) Paper must refer to genetic interactions, that is, a double genetic perturbation phenotype should be compared to single genetic perturbation phenotypes and a control phenotype. Terminology often used to describe genetic interactions includes: "suppression", "suppressed", "suppressing", "enhanced", "enhancement", "enhancing", "epistasis", "epistatic", "genetic interaction", "genetically interact", "interact genetically"
(Guess or criteria going forward) Paper should refer to physical interactions of gene products, for example protein-protein interactions or protein-RNA interactions
A paper must include data that demonstrates a relationship (or lack of relationship) between some sort of experimental treatment (eg. mutation in a gene or regulatory sequence, chemical treatment, environmental perturbation, etc.) and the expression levels of a gene/protein or localization of a protein. Expression is often measured via RT-qPCR, reporter genes, northern and western blotting, etc. Large scale assays such as microarray or RNAseq data are identified via a separate pipeline through GEO and curated by Wen, so I would consider papers that only include these experiments as "curation negative", but if the results are validated by RT-qPCR, etc., then I would curate the paper.
(Guess or criteria going forward) Papers should reference mutant phenotypes resulting from genetic variations (e.g. alleles)
A paper must report result from experiments that have been performed to locate a specific gene product within the anatomy (or life stage) of the nematode via conventional expression pattern analysis -i.e. reporter gene analysis, antibody staining, in situ hybridization (ISH), single molecule FISH, RT-PCR, qPCR, Northern and Western blotting.
-
Examples of sentences flagged as SVM positive and curation negative (the rationale is that the sentence contains the same language that would be used to describe a bona fide new experiment) WBPaper00052994
-
VD neurons were visualized with a Punc-25::gfp transgene, juIs76 [37], which is expressed in GABAergic neurons including the six DDs and 13 VDs, 18 of which extend commissures on the right side of the animal.
-
ehbp-1 is expressed in all somatic cells including neurons [33]. Furthermore, cell-specific transcriptome profiling indicated that fmo-1, fmo-4 and fmo-5 were expressed in embryonic and adult neurons, including motor neurons.
-
-
Examples of SVM positive, curation positive for which authors start from a previously described pattern and add just one sentence with additional findings:
-
fmo-4::gf pwas expressed strongly in hypodermal cells, excluding the seam cells and vulval cells, consistent with previous studies. We also observed fmo-4::gfpexpression in cells in the ventral nerve cord.
-
Pfmo-5::fmo-5::gfp was expressed strongly in the intestine as previously reported. We also observed expression along the ventral nerve cord.
-
(Guess or criteria going forward) Papers should reference overexpression phenotypes resulting from overexpression of a gene product
A paper must report results from an experiment that uses RNA interference to knockdown/alter gene expression.