| 1 |
smooth movement |
0 |
Works just like the baseline wheeled setup. |
|
cost |
+ |
Cheaper because it has no complex robotic arms. |
|
durability |
0 |
Same basic structural strength as the datum. |
|
aesthetics |
- |
Looks basic due to the external display box. |
|
interactivity |
0 |
Standard sensors offer normal desk interaction. |
| 2 (Datum) |
smooth movement |
0 |
Datum |
|
cost |
0 |
Datum |
|
durability |
0 |
Datum |
|
aesthetics |
0 |
Datum |
|
interactivity |
0 |
Datum |
| 3 |
smooth movement |
-- |
The crawler leg mechanism moves very poorly and shakes. |
|
cost |
- |
Using two different microchips makes it more expensive. |
|
durability |
-- |
The exposed leg joints break easily over time. |
|
aesthetics |
0 |
Looks average, similar to the datum. |
|
interactivity |
0 |
Basic sensor feedback comparable to the datum. |
| 4 |
smooth movement |
+ |
Gear mechanism and servo provide smooth motion. |
|
cost |
- |
Extra display and gear parts increase the cost. |
|
durability |
+ |
Wide circular base makes it very stable. |
|
aesthetics |
++ |
Modern head unit and clear screen look great. |
|
interactivity |
++ |
Great feedback from the camera, sensors, and dual screens. |
| 5 |
smooth movement |
++ |
Belt and pulley system moves very smoothly and quietly. |
|
cost |
0 |
Reasonable cost despite having helpful desk tools. |
|
durability |
++ |
Stationary desk design means no moving wheels to break. |
|
aesthetics |
++ |
Clean design with a built-in pen holder and LED. |
|
interactivity |
++ |
Touch sensors, mic, and speakers make it very easy to use. |