PostgreSQL vs MySQL: Key Differences and Considerations - VittorioDeMarzi/hero-beans GitHub Wiki
PostgreSQL and MySQL are two of the most widely used open-source relational database management systems (RDBMS). Both are reliable, performant, and supported by large communities, but they have distinct strengths that make them more suitable for different use cases.
-
PostgreSQL:
-
Known as an object-relational database.
-
Provides advanced data types (JSONB, hstore, arrays, geometric types).
-
Strong support for complex queries, window functions, CTEs, and full-text search.
-
Strict adherence to SQL standards.
-
Ideal for applications requiring data integrity and complex data structures.
-
-
MySQL:
-
A relational database focused on simplicity and speed.
-
Basic support for JSON and spatial data, but less feature-rich compared to PostgreSQL.
-
Historically less strict with SQL compliance, but recent versions improved this.
-
Often chosen for web applications where speed and ease of use are priorities.
-
-
PostgreSQL:
-
Optimized for read and write-heavy workloads with complex queries.
-
Performs better with large datasets, analytics, and reporting.
-
More efficient for concurrent transactions due to MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control).
-
-
MySQL:
-
Very fast for simple read-heavy queries, especially with the InnoDB storage engine.
-
Strong choice for OLTP systems (high volume of simple transactions).
-
Performs well when queries are straightforward and data relationships are not highly complex.
-
-
PostgreSQL:
-
Highly extensible with support for custom functions, operators, and data types.
-
Commonly used for applications that evolve quickly or require special domain logic.
-
-
MySQL:
-
Less extensible. Plugins exist but customization options are limited compared to PostgreSQL.
-
-
PostgreSQL:
-
Strong ACID compliance and robust transactional support.
-
Better at maintaining referential integrity with advanced constraints (CHECK, EXCLUDE, etc.).
-
-
MySQL:
-
Reliable with InnoDB but traditionally more lenient with constraints (e.g., silent truncation of invalid data).
-
Suitable if strict validation is handled at the application level.
-
-
PostgreSQL:
-
Backed by a strong open-source community with continuous improvements.
-
Rich ecosystem of extensions and third-party tools.
-
-
MySQL:
-
Originally open-source, now owned by Oracle (with forks like MariaDB for community-driven development).
-
Still has a massive ecosystem and strong community support.
-
-
Choose PostgreSQL if you need:
-
Complex queries and analytics.
-
Strong ACID compliance and strict data integrity.
-
Advanced data types and extensibility.
-
Applications such as financial systems, analytics platforms, scientific applications, or GIS systems.
-
-
Choose MySQL if you need:
-
High performance on simple queries.
-
A proven solution for web applications (e.g., WordPress, e-commerce platforms).
-
Ease of setup and maintenance.
-
Applications such as blogs, CMS, e-commerce stores, or simple transactional systems.
-
Feature | PostgreSQL | MySQL |
---|---|---|
Type | Object-relational | Relational |
SQL Compliance | Very strict | Less strict |
Complex Queries | Excellent support | Limited |
Performance | Best for complex + large datasets | Best for simple + read-heavy |
Extensibility | Highly extensible | Limited |
Data Integrity | Strong ACID compliance | Good, but less strict |
Best For | Analytics, finance, GIS, research | Web apps, CMS, e-commerce |
👉 In short:
-
PostgreSQL = feature-rich, strict, great for complex data and analytics.
-
MySQL = lightweight, fast, great for simple web applications.