primary_directions_constitutional_alignment - TheDaniel166/moira GitHub Wiki
Primary Directions Constitutional Alignment
Purpose
This document records the constitutional status of the major doctrine-owning subsystems inside Moira's primary-directions engine.
It exists to answer one question clearly:
- which internal subsystems are aligned enough for Phase 10 hardening, and which still need packet cleanup before top-level freeze?
Alignment Rule
An internal primary-directions subsystem is constitutionally aligned when:
- its current admitted surface is stated explicitly
- its phase language does not contradict the top-level packet
- its public policy boundary is visible
- its validation expectations are visible enough to support hardening
Subsystem Status
Methods
- current state:
- explicit method doctrine exists
- sovereignty status is explicit
- consumer runtime excludes non-verified Porphyry
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10on the current admitted surface
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- keep the backend standard and truth cards consistent with the admitted method set
Spaces
- current state:
In MundoandIn Zodiacoare admittedField Planeremains explicitly deferred
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- none required before freeze beyond packet consistency
Converse Doctrine
- current state:
DirectandTraditional converseare admittedNeo-converseremains research-only
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- none required before freeze beyond keeping
Neo-converseoutside the admitted surface
- none required before freeze beyond keeping
Keys
- current state:
Ptolemy,Naibod,Cardan, andSolarare admitted explicitly
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- update any stale standards that still speak of an older admitted trio
Relations
- current state:
- conjunction, opposition, zodiacal aspect, parallel, contra-parallel, rapt parallel, antiscion, and contra-antiscion are explicit
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- keep branch presets and truth cards explicit about active relation sets
Targets
- current state:
- base families are explicit
- narrow derived families are relation-gated and preset-gated
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10on the admitted recoverable surface
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- maintain the target-family matrix as the governing frontier boundary
Perfections
- current state:
- mundane, zodiacal longitude, and zodiacal projected perfection are explicit
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- ensure the backend standard names all three current perfection surfaces
Latitude Doctrine
- current state:
- zodiacal latitude doctrines are explicit and used in admitted branches
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- keep
field_planeexcluded until its separate doctrine is recoverable
- keep
Latitude Sources
- current state:
- admitted latitude-source families are explicit
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- none beyond consistent documentation
Branch Presets
- current state:
- named presets now select the documented runtime surfaces directly
- alignment judgment:
- aligned through
P10
- aligned through
- remaining work:
- ensure top-level doctrine and standard treat presets as part of the constitutional surface, not convenience only
Validation Surface
- current state:
- targeted tests exist
- fixture-backed validation exists for admitted narrow families
- curated public API checks exist
- alignment judgment:
- substantively aligned for
P10
- substantively aligned for
- remaining work:
- update the top-level backend standard so its validation codex reflects the actual subsystem breadth
Top-Level Judgment
Primary directions is now constitutionally aligned across its internal doctrine-owning subsystems on the current admitted recoverable surface.
What had remained out of alignment was mainly the packet narrative:
- stale narrow-branch freeze language
- stale backend standard scope
- stale top-level phase claims
That alignment work is now complete for the current freeze surface.
Policy Consequence
The correct policy line is:
Primary directions is baseline-complete on the currently recoverable doctrinal surface, and its internal doctrine-owning subsystems are aligned enough for constitutional freeze. Final Phase 11 and Phase 12 closure on the current admitted surface now rests on packet consistency, not on new feature breadth.