STELLAR_HELIACAL_CANDIDATE_SOURCE_LEDGER_2026 04 09 - TheDaniel166/moira GitHub Wiki

Stellar Heliacal Candidate Source Ledger (2026-04-09)

Purpose:

  • provide the concrete intake ledger for stellar heliacal validation sources
  • keep source discovery separate from source admission
  • ensure every candidate source is captured with enough metadata to judge whether it can become an oracle

Upstream documents:

  • wiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_VALIDATION_SOURCES_2026-04-09.md
  • wiki/03_validation/HELIACAL_VALIDATION_MATRIX_2026-04-09.md

Downstream documents:

  • wiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_VALIDATION_CORPUS_2026-04-09.md
  • wiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_CASE_LEDGER_2026-04-09.md

Current status:

  • partially populated intake ledger
  • no new non-Sirius external source admitted yet

Intake Rules

Do not admit a source into validation simply because it mentions a heliacal rising.

A candidate source must be captured first, then judged against:

  • provenance
  • explicit event semantics
  • observer/location specificity
  • calendrical clarity
  • visibility-criterion transparency

Candidate Table

Candidate ID Star Source title / citation Source kind Event kind Site / latitude Date or range Criterion stated? Oracle tier Admission status Notes
SHS-001 Sirius Censorinus / Sothic anchor lineage historical anchor heliacal rising Alexandria band / Egyptian context 139 AD anchor slice partial Tier A admitted_anchor Current governing stellar anchor in Moira.
SHS-002 Sirius Bradley E. Schaefer, “The Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Ancient Egyptian Chronology” (2000) scholarly historical reconstruction heliacal rising Alexandria / Egyptian chronology context 139 AD-centered historical discussion yes Tier A admitted_secondary Admissible as secondary scholarly support for the existing Sirius anchor; still not a new non-Sirius corpus row.
SHS-003 multi-star / general Bradley E. Schaefer, “Heliacal Rise Phenomena” (1987) scholarly methodology paper heliacal rising / setting family general methodological scope general yes Tier A admitted_secondary Admissible as methodology and criterion-law support only; not by itself a star/date oracle row.
SHS-004 TBD non-Sirius bright star candidate source not yet captured TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Tier A or B candidate_needed First non-Sirius bright-star candidate with explicit event semantics still needed.
SHS-005 TBD non-Sirius bright star candidate source not yet captured TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Tier A or B candidate_needed Second bright-star candidate with different declination geometry still needed.
SHS-006 TBD candidate historical reconstruction source not yet captured scholarly reconstruction TBD TBD TBD TBD Tier A candidate_needed Reserve slot for a non-Sirius historical reconstruction source.
SHS-007 TBD candidate modern observational-study source not yet captured observational study TBD TBD TBD TBD Tier A or B candidate_needed Reserve slot for a modern stellar visibility study with usable row data.

Admission Status Meanings

  • admitted_anchor already admitted as a governing validation anchor
  • candidate_needed slot intentionally reserved; no source captured yet
  • captured_pending_review source is identified but not yet judged admissible
  • admitted_secondary admissible as a secondary oracle or corpus member
  • rejected source reviewed and explicitly excluded

Required Review Questions

For each future captured source:

  1. Does it identify a specific star unambiguously?
  2. Does it specify first visibility, last visibility, or another event family explicitly?
  3. Does it provide a site, latitude, or region precise enough to model?
  4. Does it provide a date, year, or constrained date range?
  5. Does it state or imply an observational criterion clearly enough to compare against Moira policy?
  6. Is it primary, scholarly secondary, or merely convenience commentary?
  7. If historical, how much calendrical reconstruction uncertainty is present?

If those questions cannot be answered, the source should not become part of the admitted validation corpus.

Immediate Next Fill Targets

The first useful additions to this ledger should be:

  1. capture one non-Sirius historically prominent bright-star source
  2. capture one source family from modern observational visibility literature
  3. convert the first admissible non-Sirius source into a row in the stellar case ledger
  4. keep SHS-002 and SHS-003 as secondary support rather than treating them as broad closure

Current Captured Scholarly Candidates

Already captured in this ledger:

  • Bradley E. Schaefer, Heliacal Rise Phenomena (1987)
  • Bradley E. Schaefer, The Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Ancient Egyptian Chronology (2000)

These now have the following status:

  • SHS-002: admitted as secondary scholarly support for the Sirius anchor
  • SHS-003: admitted as secondary methodology support

Neither source closes the non-Sirius corpus gap by itself.

Current Honest State

Right now, Sirius remains the only clearly admitted stellar heliacal validation anchor.

Moira now also has two explicitly admitted secondary scholarly supports for that anchor and for stellar-heliacal methodology, but still lacks an admitted non-Sirius external validation row.

This ledger exists so future expansion happens under provenance discipline rather than ad hoc reference gathering.