STELLAR_HELIACAL_CANDIDATE_SOURCE_LEDGER_2026 04 09 - TheDaniel166/moira GitHub Wiki
Stellar Heliacal Candidate Source Ledger (2026-04-09)
Purpose:
- provide the concrete intake ledger for stellar heliacal validation sources
- keep source discovery separate from source admission
- ensure every candidate source is captured with enough metadata to judge whether it can become an oracle
Upstream documents:
wiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_VALIDATION_SOURCES_2026-04-09.mdwiki/03_validation/HELIACAL_VALIDATION_MATRIX_2026-04-09.md
Downstream documents:
wiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_VALIDATION_CORPUS_2026-04-09.mdwiki/03_validation/STELLAR_HELIACAL_CASE_LEDGER_2026-04-09.md
Current status:
- partially populated intake ledger
- no new non-Sirius external source admitted yet
Intake Rules
Do not admit a source into validation simply because it mentions a heliacal rising.
A candidate source must be captured first, then judged against:
- provenance
- explicit event semantics
- observer/location specificity
- calendrical clarity
- visibility-criterion transparency
Candidate Table
| Candidate ID | Star | Source title / citation | Source kind | Event kind | Site / latitude | Date or range | Criterion stated? | Oracle tier | Admission status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHS-001 | Sirius | Censorinus / Sothic anchor lineage | historical anchor | heliacal rising | Alexandria band / Egyptian context | 139 AD anchor slice | partial | Tier A | admitted_anchor | Current governing stellar anchor in Moira. |
| SHS-002 | Sirius | Bradley E. Schaefer, “The Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Ancient Egyptian Chronology” (2000) | scholarly historical reconstruction | heliacal rising | Alexandria / Egyptian chronology context | 139 AD-centered historical discussion | yes | Tier A | admitted_secondary | Admissible as secondary scholarly support for the existing Sirius anchor; still not a new non-Sirius corpus row. |
| SHS-003 | multi-star / general | Bradley E. Schaefer, “Heliacal Rise Phenomena” (1987) | scholarly methodology paper | heliacal rising / setting family | general methodological scope | general | yes | Tier A | admitted_secondary | Admissible as methodology and criterion-law support only; not by itself a star/date oracle row. |
| SHS-004 | TBD non-Sirius bright star | candidate source not yet captured | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | Tier A or B | candidate_needed | First non-Sirius bright-star candidate with explicit event semantics still needed. |
| SHS-005 | TBD non-Sirius bright star | candidate source not yet captured | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | Tier A or B | candidate_needed | Second bright-star candidate with different declination geometry still needed. |
| SHS-006 | TBD | candidate historical reconstruction source not yet captured | scholarly reconstruction | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | Tier A | candidate_needed | Reserve slot for a non-Sirius historical reconstruction source. |
| SHS-007 | TBD | candidate modern observational-study source not yet captured | observational study | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | Tier A or B | candidate_needed | Reserve slot for a modern stellar visibility study with usable row data. |
Admission Status Meanings
admitted_anchoralready admitted as a governing validation anchorcandidate_neededslot intentionally reserved; no source captured yetcaptured_pending_reviewsource is identified but not yet judged admissibleadmitted_secondaryadmissible as a secondary oracle or corpus memberrejectedsource reviewed and explicitly excluded
Required Review Questions
For each future captured source:
- Does it identify a specific star unambiguously?
- Does it specify first visibility, last visibility, or another event family explicitly?
- Does it provide a site, latitude, or region precise enough to model?
- Does it provide a date, year, or constrained date range?
- Does it state or imply an observational criterion clearly enough to compare against Moira policy?
- Is it primary, scholarly secondary, or merely convenience commentary?
- If historical, how much calendrical reconstruction uncertainty is present?
If those questions cannot be answered, the source should not become part of the admitted validation corpus.
Immediate Next Fill Targets
The first useful additions to this ledger should be:
- capture one non-Sirius historically prominent bright-star source
- capture one source family from modern observational visibility literature
- convert the first admissible non-Sirius source into a row in the stellar case ledger
- keep SHS-002 and SHS-003 as secondary support rather than treating them as broad closure
Current Captured Scholarly Candidates
Already captured in this ledger:
- Bradley E. Schaefer,
Heliacal Rise Phenomena(1987) - Bradley E. Schaefer,
The Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Ancient Egyptian Chronology(2000)
These now have the following status:
- SHS-002: admitted as secondary scholarly support for the Sirius anchor
- SHS-003: admitted as secondary methodology support
Neither source closes the non-Sirius corpus gap by itself.
Current Honest State
Right now, Sirius remains the only clearly admitted stellar heliacal validation anchor.
Moira now also has two explicitly admitted secondary scholarly supports for that anchor and for stellar-heliacal methodology, but still lacks an admitted non-Sirius external validation row.
This ledger exists so future expansion happens under provenance discipline rather than ad hoc reference gathering.