4 myths about academic writing - SrijibDutta/srijiblog GitHub Wiki

Academic writing is an indispensable practice in today’s knowledge-fueled world. And, as one of the key activities of the modern world, it sparks a lot of misleading stereotypes and conceptions that keep many inexperienced writers off the track of success. Created by those who have little understanding of science writing, the myths and legends surrounding this practice are both hilarious and sometimes irritating, confounding the minds of experts who know inside information about academic writing.

And what if these lies and unreasonable misconceptions start growing in quantity and spread over the academic world uncontrollably? The solution is simple: start disproving them as effectively as they circulate in the science realm! With that in mind, brace yourself for the top myths about science writing and their demolition!

Myth 1: Academic Writing Is a Hated Practice

This is not quite true. Academic writing is an intricate and complex activity that puzzles many college kids, driving them to buy essay writing from competent writers. But it’s not a hated activity – first, even most of the students who have a downright hard time writing papers are interested in exploring academic subjects and don’t view writing papers as something unbearable. Second, science writing, to the surprise of many people, is an engaging and attractive activity for many college kids who can’t get enough of developing science papers on the topics they find interesting.

Myth 2: Science Writing Should Be Developed With Complex Language

This is a pretty common stereotype about science writing that often misleads many naive students, leading them to believe that using elegant language, including an excessive amount of complex and irrelevant terms, rare words, and wordy sentences, is beneficial for the quality of their paper. But, in reality, advanced language, along with cumbersome sentence constructions and rare terms, doesn’t add any value to your writing unless there’s a real need for using a certain term or complex sentence while explaining something. Thus, fluffing up your text with “exquisite” literary language, trying to make up for the lack of academic value of your paper, will only make your writing shallow and unprofessional, and make you look pretentious.

Myth 3: Experienced Writers Don’t Need Planning

Careful planning is important in developing an essay, as it helps writers think in advance what they will include in their papers and build a strategy for their work. And the significance of planning remains the same even for advanced writers, too. Many people tend to think that the expertise and proficiency that acclaimed writers possess are enough for being successful with the papers they craft, so they can freely leave aside the seemingly important step of planning. But this is no more than a ridiculous misconception, which misguides young writers, prompting them to think that to omit planning is an indicator of mastery. The truth is that planning a paper is a regular and critical practice that all conscious writers follow, be it a professional author or a newbie who wants to achieve great things in academic writing.

Myth 4: Adapting the Style to a Specific Audience Is Unprofessional

This stereotype exists due to the mistaken idea that a professional writer needs to have their own style of writing (while still following the established academic standards). This is not quite true. Yes, advanced writers need to have their preferred writing style, but there’s nothing wrong with experimenting with styles or adapting them to some particular audience in terms of academic competence. All academic papers may have different target audiences and thus require different approaches from writers, who have to make their papers comprehensible to the target audience of their writing. When developing a science paper for a group of Python developers from an IT company based in Europe, a specific style and manner of providing information will be needed from the writer. And an essay targeted at literature critics from an esteemed university will require another approach from the author.

Do You Still Believe in Myths?

To many, including seasoned scholars, academic writing is an unfamiliar phenomenon bridging science and the human understanding of life. This is what has spread so much speculation and “mist” over this global activity. Science writing may be too sophisticated and unnerving to be perceived by everyone in the right way, but immersing this practice in silly misconceptions is the wrong way to go as long as people in the academic realm want to sharpen their insight into their chosen subjects. We hope that we managed to fix the incorrect perceptions of academic writing you held because of the myths surrounding this practice!