Mister ED SAD Review and Results - SENG-350-2024-fall/Team-1 GitHub Wiki
Includes how review was conducted, who conducted it, the question set used
| 1. Question set name: Reviewing the architecture and architecture documentation (AD) to ensure they are fit the system and its purpose. | |||
| 2. Purpose: Use this question set to assess the quality of the architecture and the AD such that it matches the system description and purpose. | |||
| 3. Stakeholders and concerns: Architects, who specify and design the architecture and AD. Stakeholders who can confirm or refute that the designed architecture and AD is fit for the system purpose, and they can frame their concerns adequately. | |||
| 4. Questions | 4a. Respondents | 4b. Expected answers | 4c. Criticality |
| 1. Does the architecture and AD frame the system corresponding to the system description? 2. Is the architecture and AD implemented with consistently and to a professional standard? 3. Is the design consistent with standards used in industry? 4. Does the project have the necessary resources (tools, technologies, methods, skilled people, etc.) to plan and carry out the creation of the architecture and AD? 5. Is every viewpoint included in the AD? |
Stakeholders | "Yes” is generally the expected answer. Respondents should be prepared to point out where material in the AD supports their answers. | Questions are most critical that address areas of high risk: • architectural viewpoints have not been selected • architectural viewpoints not welldefined • stakeholder concerns that cannot be captured using the representational resources of the selected viewpoints • viewpoints that are not achievable due to resource or tool constraints |
|
5. Advice Be sure to complete this review in a group setting where all opinions can be heard. This review process should take at most 10 minutes. This is to ensure that what is discussed is only necessary. Encourage moving on to another point if the discussion feels circular. |
|||
| 1. Question set used: Reviewing the architecture and architecture documentation (AD) to ensure they are fit the system and its purpose. | |
|
2. Purpose: To assess the Mister ED system. |
|
| 3. Stakeholders present: Architects from Team 1 and Developers from Team ___ | |
| 4. Questions | 4a. Answers |
| 1. Does the architecture and AD frame the system corresponding to the system description? 2. Is the architecture and AD implemented with consistently and to a professional standard? 3. Is the design consistent with standards used in industry? 4. Does the project have the necessary resources (tools, technologies, methods, skilled people, etc.) to plan and carry out the creation of the architecture and AD? 5. Is every viewpoint included in the AD? |
1. ______ 2. ______ 3. ______ 4. ______ 5. ______ |
|
5. Advice Be sure to complete this review in a group setting where all opinions can be heard. This review process should take at most 10 minutes. This is to ensure that what is discussed is only necessary. Encourage moving on to another point if the discussion feels circular. |
|
| 1. Question set used: Reviewing the architecture and architecture documentation (AD) to ensure they are fit the system and its purpose. | |
|
2. Purpose: To assess the Mister ED system. |
|
| 3. Stakeholders present: Architects from Team 1 and Developers from Team 4 | |
| 4. Questions | 4a. Answers |
| 1. Does the architecture and AD frame the system corresponding to the system description? 2. Is the architecture and AD implemented with consistently and to a professional standard? 3. Is the design consistent with standards used in industry? 4. Does the project have the necessary resources (tools, technologies, methods, skilled people, etc.) to plan and carry out the creation of the architecture and AD? 5. Is every viewpoint included in the AD? |
1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes 5. Yes |
|
5. Advice Be sure to complete this review in a group setting where all opinions can be heard. This review process should take at most 10 minutes. This is to ensure that what is discussed is only necessary. Encourage moving on to another point if the discussion feels circular. |
|
| 1. Question set used: Reviewing the architecture and architecture documentation (AD) to ensure they are fit the system and its purpose. | |
|
2. Purpose: To assess the Mister ED system. |
|
| 3. Stakeholders present: Architects from Team 1 and Developers from Team 7 | |
| 4. Questions | 4a. Answers |
| 1. Does the architecture and AD frame the system corresponding to the system description? 2. Is the architecture and AD implemented with consistently and to a professional standard? 3. Is the design consistent with standards used in industry? 4. Does the project have the necessary resources (tools, technologies, methods, skilled people, etc.) to plan and carry out the creation of the architecture and AD? 5. Is every viewpoint included in the AD? |
1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Yes 4. Yes 5. No, just one view we think? Edit the doc to make it more clear |
|
5. Advice Be sure to complete this review in a group setting where all opinions can be heard. This review process should take at most 10 minutes. This is to ensure that what is discussed is only necessary. Encourage moving on to another point if the discussion feels circular. |
|