5.O CONCEPT SELECTION - S-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-15 GitHub Wiki
1. ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES | WEIGHTS |
---|---|
Weight of the machine | 6 |
Machine should have direct power supply | 8 |
machine should be semi automatic | 9 |
Machine should be User friendly | 8 |
Machine should be aesthetic | 8 |
2. PUGH CHART
DESIGN OBJECTIVE | WEIGHTS | DESIGN 1 | DESIGN 2 | DESIGN 3 | DESIGN 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight of the machine | 6 | datum | + | - | + |
Machine should have direct power supply | 8 | datum | - | + | + |
machine should be semi automatic | 9 | datum | 0 | + | -- |
Machine should be User friendly | 8 | datum | + | - | ++ |
Machine should be aesthetic | 8 | datum | + | + | + |
Score{+} | 0 | 22 | 25 | 38 | |
Score{-} | 0 | -8 | -14 | -18 | |
Total | 0 | 14 | 11 | 20 |
3. JUSTIFICATION
DESIGN NO. | OBJECTIVES | SCORE ALLOTED | JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORE |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Weight of the machine | datum | as reference |
Machine should have direct power supply | datum | as reference | |
machine should be semi automatic | datum | as reference | |
Machine should be User friendly | datum | as reference | |
Machine should be aesthetic | datum | as reference | |
---- | ----- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
2 | Weight of machine | + | Its weight is lesser than datum |
Machine should have direct power supply | - | It not have direct power supply compared to that of datum | |
machine should be semi automatic | 0 | It is manuated same as compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be User friendly | + | It is more user friendly compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be aesthetic | + | It is more aesthetic pleasing as compared to that of datum | |
----- | ------- | -------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
3 | Weight of machine | - | Its weight is more than datum |
machine should have direct power supply | - | Its not have direct power supply compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be semi automatic | + | It is more motorized compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be user friendly | - | It is less user friendly compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be aesthetic | - | It is less aesthetic pleasing as compared to that of datum | |
------- | ----- | -------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
4 | Weight of machine | + | Its weight is lesser than datum |
Machine should have direct power supply | + | It is more convenient direct power supply compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be semi automatic | -- | It is less semi automatic compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be user friendly | ++ | It is more user friendly compared to that of datum | |
Machine should be aesthetic | + | It is more pleasing compared to that of datum |
4.SELECTED DESIGN
5 FUNCTIONAL CLUSTERING
![image]
6.PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE
6.a SUB SYSTEM LIST
sl.no | sub system |
---|---|
1 | User indication |
2 | Tilak selecting |
3 | Tilak applying |
4 | Casing |
6.b SUB SYSTEM INTERACTION
User indication | Tilak selecting | Tilak applying | Casing |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial | no | no | no |
Data | yes | yes | yes |
Material | no | no | no |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Tilak selecting | User indication | Tilak applying | Casing |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial | yes | no | yes |
Data | yes | no | no |
Material | no | no | no |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Tilak applying | User indication | Tilak selecting | Casing |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial | yes | yes | yes |
Data | yes | no | no |
Material | yes | yes | no |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Casing | User indication | Tilak selecting | Tilak applying |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial | no | yes | yes |
Data | no | no | no |
Material | no | no | no |