5.CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCTS ARCHITECTURE - S-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki
Task 1: Assign weights to the objectives
Sl.no |
Objectives |
Weights |
1 |
User-friendly |
4 |
2 |
Semi-automatic |
5 |
3 |
Lightweight |
8 |
4 |
Heat-resistant |
6 |
5 |
Convenient assistance |
9 |
Task 2: Pugh chart for the alternate designs
Sl.no |
Objective |
Weights |
Design-1 |
Design-2 |
Design-3 |
Design-4 |
Design-5 |
1 |
User-friendly |
4 |
Datum |
+ |
- |
++ |
0 |
2 |
Semi-automatic |
5 |
Datum |
- |
- |
0 |
+ |
3 |
Lightweight |
8 |
Datum |
++ |
+ |
+ |
0 |
4 |
Heat-resistance |
6 |
Datum |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
5 |
Convenient assistance |
9 |
Datum |
0 |
- |
+ |
+ |
|
score(+) |
|
0 |
20 |
10 |
31 |
14 |
|
score(-) |
|
0 |
11 |
18 |
0 |
6 |
|
Total score |
|
0 |
9 |
31 |
8 |
|
5.1 : Justifications of the allocated score
Design no |
Objective |
Score allocated |
Justification of the score |
|
user- friendly |
0 |
datum |
|
semi-automatic |
0 |
datum |
1 |
lightweight |
0 |
datum |
|
heat-resistant |
0 |
datum |
|
Convenient assistance |
0 |
datum |
Design no |
Objective |
Score allocated |
Justification of the score |
|
user- friendly |
1 |
it is more user friendly than datum |
|
semi-automatic |
-1 |
it is not as semi automatic as datum |
2 |
lightweight |
+2 |
it is more lightweight than datum |
|
heat-resistant |
-1 |
it is not as heat resistant as datum |
|
Convenient assistance |
0 |
it is as convenient as datum |
Design no |
Objective |
Score allocated |
Justification of the score |
|
user- friendly |
-1 |
it is not as user friendly as datum |
|
semi-automatic |
-1 |
it is not semi automatic |
3 |
lightweight |
+1 |
it is more light weight than datum |
|
heat-resistant |
+1 |
it is more heat resistant then datum |
|
Convenient assistance |
-1 |
it is not as convenient as datum |
Design no |
Objective |
Score allocated |
Justification of the score |
|
user- friendly |
+2 |
it more user friendly |
|
semi-automatic |
0 |
it is more semi automatic than datum |
4 |
lightweight |
+1 |
it is not light weight |
|
heat-resistant |
+1 |
it is more heat resistant then datum |
|
Convenient assistance |
+1 |
it is more convenient than datum |
Design no |
Objective |
Score allocated |
Justification of the score |
|
user- friendly |
0 |
it is not very user friendly |
|
semi-automatic |
+1 |
it is more semi automatic than datum |
5 |
lightweight |
0 |
it not light weight |
|
heat-resistant |
-1 |
it is not as heat resistant as datum |
|
Convenient assistance |
+1 |
it is more convenient then datum |
5.2 : Selected design

5.3 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE
5.4 FUNCTION CLUSTERING
5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS
Subsystem list
sl.no |
subsystem |
1 |
Performing arti unit |
2 |
Ringing belt unit |
3 |
Indication unit |
Interaction details
subsystem 1 |
subsystem 2 |
subsystem 3 |
Spatial |
yes |
no |
Data |
no |
yes |
Material |
no |
no |
subsystem 2 |
subsystem3 |
subsystem 1 |
Spatial |
no |
yes |
Data |
yes |
yes |
Material |
no |
no |
subsystem 3 |
subsystem 1 |
subsystem 2 |
Spatial |
no |
no |
Data |
no |
no |
Material |
yes |
yes |