5.CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCTS ARCHITECTURE - S-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki
Task 1: Assign weights to the objectives
| Sl.no | Objectives | Weights |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | User-friendly | 4 |
| 2 | Semi-automatic | 5 |
| 3 | Lightweight | 8 |
| 4 | Heat-resistant | 6 |
| 5 | Convenient assistance | 9 |
Task 2: Pugh chart for the alternate designs
| Sl.no | Objective | Weights | Design-1 | Design-2 | Design-3 | Design-4 | Design-5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | User-friendly | 4 | Datum | + | - | ++ | 0 |
| 2 | Semi-automatic | 5 | Datum | - | - | 0 | + |
| 3 | Lightweight | 8 | Datum | ++ | + | + | 0 |
| 4 | Heat-resistance | 6 | Datum | - | + | + | - |
| 5 | Convenient assistance | 9 | Datum | 0 | - | + | + |
| score(+) | 0 | 20 | 10 | 31 | 14 | ||
| score(-) | 0 | 11 | 18 | 0 | 6 | ||
| Total score | 0 | 9 | 31 | 8 |
5.1 : Justifications of the allocated score
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification of the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| user- friendly | 0 | datum | |
| semi-automatic | 0 | datum | |
| 1 | lightweight | 0 | datum |
| heat-resistant | 0 | datum | |
| Convenient assistance | 0 | datum |
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification of the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| user- friendly | 1 | it is more user friendly than datum | |
| semi-automatic | -1 | it is not as semi automatic as datum | |
| 2 | lightweight | +2 | it is more lightweight than datum |
| heat-resistant | -1 | it is not as heat resistant as datum | |
| Convenient assistance | 0 | it is as convenient as datum |
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification of the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| user- friendly | -1 | it is not as user friendly as datum | |
| semi-automatic | -1 | it is not semi automatic | |
| 3 | lightweight | +1 | it is more light weight than datum |
| heat-resistant | +1 | it is more heat resistant then datum | |
| Convenient assistance | -1 | it is not as convenient as datum |
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification of the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| user- friendly | +2 | it more user friendly | |
| semi-automatic | 0 | it is more semi automatic than datum | |
| 4 | lightweight | +1 | it is not light weight |
| heat-resistant | +1 | it is more heat resistant then datum | |
| Convenient assistance | +1 | it is more convenient than datum |
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification of the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| user- friendly | 0 | it is not very user friendly | |
| semi-automatic | +1 | it is more semi automatic than datum | |
| 5 | lightweight | 0 | it not light weight |
| heat-resistant | -1 | it is not as heat resistant as datum | |
| Convenient assistance | +1 | it is more convenient then datum |
5.2 : Selected design
5.3 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE
5.4 FUNCTION CLUSTERING
5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS
Subsystem list
| sl.no | subsystem |
|---|---|
| 1 | Performing arti unit |
| 2 | Ringing belt unit |
| 3 | Indication unit |
Interaction details
| subsystem 1 | subsystem 2 | subsystem 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | yes | no |
| Data | no | yes |
| Material | no | no |
| subsystem 2 | subsystem3 | subsystem 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | no | yes |
| Data | yes | yes |
| Material | no | no |
| subsystem 3 | subsystem 1 | subsystem 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | no | no |
| Data | no | no |
| Material | yes | yes |