Individual Thoughts:

Mushfiqus:

In my opinion, our project turned out very well given the time crunch we were under. Even though there was not a lot of time we were still able to come up with a functional webapp with the required features. On my part of the project, I fulfilled all of my required features. Since, our focus was on the backend more my/our front-end wasn’t as colorful as we would have liked. However, we went above and beyond by using package based development as well as by using apex testing. For our next project we/I should focus more on front-end styling and we will make sure our integrated app runs smoothly and that it can incorporate our components without any technical difficulties.

Matthew:

The project was successful in the sense that a website was produced. However, the site could have had a few more weeks to progress in functionality vice what was presented. The team did a good job coming together in the ended to produce a cohesive product, though, and the communication was excellent as far as what could be accomplished in the time frame provided.

Michael:

I think the project was successful for the first sprint. We were able to produce a functioning LWC single-page app in the Experience Cloud. Due to time constraints we did lack styling and a well-formed presentation. But overall, we were able to implement all the requirements as well as achieve some stretch goals. Making use of package-based development was a plus. While my feature didn’t make the presentation, it won’t hold me back from starting another feature in the next sprint, the CSP Trusted Site wasn’t added for the new org when the package was installed and there was no time to add it due to the last-minute submission…Need to work on time-management!

Patrick:

I feel as if there was not a lot of time to work on the project save for the last week due to people taking the ADM certification exam at the same time. We had 2 weeks to complete the project but half of that was dedicated to doing the ADM exam at the same time. While the team did well overall, there could have been some improvements on the website's styling in particular. The presentation went well, but it could have gone better if there was more time spent practicing.

Eli:

I think overall the group did fantastic. We were overall a little more back-end than desired, but given the crunch we were under, I believe we did very well. However the work time was very restrictive. I was able to help my teammates with code and saw how well we were doing overall. I believe my main failing point was in the presentation itself; my styling was almost nonexistent as well. Definitely something to work better on.

Group Thoughts:

Group Goods:

Our LWC’s worked exactly as expected. Our Apex was tested with over 70% coverage on everybody’s packages. Our triggers were tested to have worked (as well as having passed unit tests). Overall our back-end was fantastic, as was our work ethic.

Group Bads:

We succeeded in completing our project, we left the presentation until the very last minute; we did not even practice our presentation. We had relatively little CSS styling, and what we had was fairly basic, and not consistent between team members.