Sprint 2: Feedback implementation and improvements

Collected feedback

Key feedback from stakeholders and initial testing:

University stakeholders

1. Small universities' perspective

   • Need for cost-effective solutions
   • Simpler implementation requirements
   • Concerns about technical support

2. Administrative feedback

   • Bureaucratic challenges identified
   • Need for clear implementation process
   • Data protection concerns
   • Integration with existing systems

User feedback

• Low adoption rate of current university apps (40:1)
• Concerns about mass access scenarios
• Need for physical backup systems
• Security vs convenience balance

Implemented improvements

1. Convenience enhancements

• Streamlined login process
• Quick access features
• Integrated payment systems
• Intuitive user interface

2. Edge case solutions

• Mass access management system
  • Smart queuing
  • Multiple entry points
  • Load balancing
• Offline functionality
• Battery-low protocols
• Emergency access procedures

3. Security upgrades

• Enhanced encryption
• SSO Login

Technical implementation

1. Hardware Integration
   • Partnership with German providers
   • Standardized protocols

Final prototype features

Core functionality

• Digital ID display and management
• Access control systems
• Payment integration
• Improved Process for Registering