3. Concept evaluation and selected concept - R-division-2020-2021-even/Repo-07 GitHub Wiki

CONCEPT EVALUATION

a) Pugh Chart

Task 1- Assigning weights to the objectives

Objectives Weights
kids safety 8
attractive 6
portability 5
ease of use 6
cost 7

Task 2 : Pugh chart for the 4 alternative designs shown in figures

Design Objectives Weights Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4
kids safety 8 + Datum + +
attractive 6 ++ Datum + 0
portability 5 0 Datum 0 +
ease of use 6 + Datum 0 +
cost 7 0 Datum + 0
Score(+) 26 21 19

b) Justifications

sl.no Design objectives weights justifications
1 User - friendly 8 It is easy to use compared to design 2
Option to change the music 3 Change of music's can be done easily ,compared to design 2
The bot and the jaltarang should be separate 4 The robot and the cups are attached to each other at particular distance
Movable 4 Can be moved easily , compared to design 2
Operates using the battery 5 It can opertaed more than a limited time compared to the design 2
2 User - friendly Datum
Option to change the music Datum
The bot and the jaltarang should be separate Datum
Movable Datum
Operates using the battery Datum
3 User - friendly 4 Easy to control the bot
Option to change the music 0 Similar to design 2
The bot and the jaltaranag should be separate 4 The bot and jalarang are seperate so that can help to strike the cup easily
Movable 0 Similar to design 2
Operates using the battery 5 Plays for more duration compared to design 2
4 User - friendly 4 yes,the bot is user-friendly
Option to change the music 0 same as that of design 2
The bot and the jaltaranag should be separate 4 bot and the instrument both are separate
Movable 0 in both designs body of the bot and arms are movable
Operates using the battery 5 yes,the bot operates using battery

SELECTED CONCEPT

By using pugh chart we selected concept 1 as the final concept as it satisfies all the objectives.