5. Concept Selection And Product Architecture - R-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-09 GitHub Wiki

5.1 ASSIGNING WEIGHTS TO OBJECTIVES

5.2 PUGH CHART FOR CONCEPT DESIGN SELECTION

SL NO	OBJECTIVES	weight	concept design 1	concept design 2	concept design 3	concept design 4
1	Portable	7	datum	+	-	+
2	Child safe	9	datum	0	0	+
3	Manual	8	datum	+	-	0
4	User friendly	8	datum	+	0	0
5	education with fun	7	datum	+	-	-
6		score(+)	0	30	0	16
7		score(-)	0	0	-22	-7
8		Total	0	30	-22	9

5.3 Justification for this scores given

SL NO	DESIGN NAME	OBJECTIVE	SCORE ALLOCATED	JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SCORE
1	Design 01	Portable	datum	---------
		Child safe	datum	-----
		Manual	datum	--------
		User friendly	datum	--------
		Education with fun	datum	-------
2	Design 02	Portable	7	due to light weight
		Child safe	0	no sharp things are used in this model
		Manual	8	the model is completely manual
		User friendly	8	the model involves a simple mechanism
		Education with fun	7	child can learn the subjects with the fun
3	design 03	Portable	-7	due to its heavyu weight
		Child safe	0	no sharp things are used
		Manual	-8	it is not completely manual
		User friendly	0	model has easy ascess of operation
		Education with fun	-7	as compered to datum it gives less fun
4	design 04	Portable	7	due to light weight
		Child safe	9	the model is closed thereby not giving access to electrical components directly
		Manual	0	the model involves continous observation
		User friendly	0	esay to operate the controls
		Education with fun	7	provides lot of knowledge with entertainment

5.4 SELECTED DESIGN

vi of edu final design

front view

5.5 FUNCTION CLUSTERING

function clustering

5.6 SUBSYSTEM LIST

INTRACTION DETAILS