3(c).CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PUGH Chart and Design Selection - Q-Division-2019-2020-Even/Team-9 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

Objective Weightage Design Idea 1 Design Idea 2 Design Idea 3 Design Idea 4
Automatic 8 + Datum + +
Portability 5 - Datum -- -
User friendly 4 + Datum 0 ++
Use of Standard Parts 3 + Datum + +
Cost 3 - Datum -- -
+Score 15 11 19
-Score 8 16 8
Total 7 0 -5 11

The Best Concept selected is Design Idea 4. Design Idea 4

Justifications:

Design Idea No. Objective Score given Justification
1 Automatic + It is quite more automated than datum
Portability - It is less portable than datum
User friendly + Easy to use
Use of standard parts + Compared to datum more standard parts are used
Cost - Bit expensive compared to datum
2 Automatic Datum
Portability Datum
User friendly Datum Reference design
Use of standard parts Datum
Cost Datum
3 Automatic + It is quite more automated than datum
Portability -- Portability is less due to bigger size
User friendly 0 Similar to datum
Use of standard parts + Compared to more standard parts are used
Cost -- More expensive than datum due to large frame design
4 Automatic + It is quite more automated than datum
Portability - Portability is less compared to datum
User friendly ++ Easy to use and efficiency is more
Use of standard parts + Compared datum to more standard parts are used(Ex: dc motor,etc.)
Cost - Bit expensive compared to datum