PUGH CHART - Q-Division-2019-2020-Even/Team-18 GitHub Wiki

Identified and Prioritised objectives

SI.NO Objectives
1 Safety
2 Semi-automatic
3 Portability
4 Use of standard parts
5 Cost
6 Entertainment

Assign weightage for the stated objectives.

Objectives Weightage
Safety 8
Semi-automatic 4
Portability 5
Use of standard parts 4
Cost 4
Entertainment 6

PUGH CHART

Objectives weightage Design idea 1 Design idea 2 Design idea 3 Design idea 4
Safety 8 Datum + - +
Semi-automatic 4 Datum ++ - 0
Portability 5 Datum + + +
use of standard parts 4 Datum + 0 +
cost 4 Datum + - 0
Entertainment 6 Datum + + 0
+Score 0 35 11 17
-Score 0 0 16 0
Total 35 0 -5 17

The best concept selected is design 1.

JUSTIFICATIONS.

Design idea no Objective Score given Justification
1 Safety 8 Datum
Semi-automatic 8 Datum
Portability 5 Datum
Use of standard parts 4 Datum
Cost 4 Datum
Entertainment 6 Datum
2 Safety 0 There is no chance of breaking
Semi-automatic 0 It is more user friendly
Portability 0 It as less weight
Use of standard parts 0 Contains more efficient parts
Cost 0 Cost is less as compared to datum
Entertainment 0 As it is more exciting game
3 Safety -8 Due to weight of system working would be slow
Semi-automatic -4 It is less efficient
Portability 5 Weight is considerable
Use of standard parts 0 Same number of components
Cost -4 Cost of components is more
Entertainment 6 It is so exiting to tackle duck in ferry
4 Safety 8 There is no chance of stopping slipping of the ducks
Semi-automatic 0 It is same as datum
Portability 5 It is easy to carry
Use of standard parts 4 Usage of more standard Components
Cost 0 Approximately same as datum
Entertainment 0 It is more entertaining to hit at the exact part of the rotating duck.