5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - Q-Div-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-13 GitHub Wiki
PUGH CHART
5.1 JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORE GIVEN
| Design No | Objectives | Score allocated | Justification for the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | User friendly | 8 | We can use the system more easily |
| Sensor | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Clean and hygienic | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Portability | 7 | More portable than datum | |
| cost | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| compact and attractive | 5 | Much beautiful than datum | |
| 2. | User friendly | 0 | Datum |
| Sensor | 0 | Datum | |
| Clean and hygienic | 0 | Datum | |
| Portability | 0 | Datum | |
| Cost | 0 | Datum | |
| Compact and attractive | 0 | Datum | |
| 3. | User friendly | -8 | Not better than datum |
| Sensor | -7 | Not better than datum | |
| Clean and hygienic | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Portability | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Cost | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Compact and attractive | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| 4. | User friendly | 0 | Same as that of datum |
| sensor | 0 | Not much difference as compare to datum | |
| Clean and hygienic | -9 | System is not clean than datum | |
| Portability | 7 | Better portability features are there in the system | |
| Cost | 7 | Need much money as compared to datum | |
| compact and attractive | 5 | More beautiful than datum |
A.(i)Assign weights to the objectives
| Objectives | Weights |
|---|---|
| User friendly | 8 |
| Sensor | 7 |
| Clean and hygienic | 9 |
| portability | 7 |
| Cost | 7 |
| Compact and attractive | 5 |
5.2 SELECTED DESIGN
5.3 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE
| Seed Dispensing | Storing in container | Dispensing on tray |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial interaction | No | Yes |
| Data interaction | Yes | Yes |
| Material interaction | Yes | yes |
| Growing light | Falling on microgreen |
|---|---|
| Spatial interaction | Yes |
| Data interaction | Yes |
| Material interaction | Yes |
| Water | Storing in container | Dispensing on tray |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial interaction | No | Yes |
| Data interaction | No | Yes |
| Material interaction | No | Yes |
5.4 FUNCTION CLUSTERING
5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS
Assign weights to the objectives
| Objectives | Weights |
|---|---|
| User friendly | 8 |
| Sensor | 7 |
| Clean and hygienic | 9 |
| portability | 7 |
| Cost | 7 |
| Compact and attractive | 5 |
| Design objectives | Weights | Design 1 | Design 2 | Design 3 | Design 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User friendly | 8 | "+" | Datum | "-" | "0" |
| Sensor | 7 | "0" | Datum | "-" | "0" |
| Clean and hygienic | 9 | "0" | Datum | "0" | "-" |
| portability | 7 | "+" | Datum | "0" | "+" |
| Cost | 7 | "0" | Datum | "0" | "+" |
| Compact and attractive | 5 | "+" | Datum | "0" | "+" |
| Total | 20 | 0 | -15 | 10 |