5.CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - Q-Div-2022-2023-Odd/Repo-10 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

DESIGN OBJECTIVES WEIGHTS DESIGN1 DESIGN2 DESIGN3 DESIGN4
Safety 5 datum - ++ ++
Ease to use 8 datum + + +
Portability 6 datum 0 - ++
Use of standard parts 7 datum + + -
cost 9 datum - 0 +
Score(+) 0 15 25 34
Score(-) 0 14 6 7
total 0 1 19 27

JUSTIFICATION FOR THE GIVEN SCORE:

5.1:JUSTIFICATION OF DESIGN 01(datum) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN 2

OBJECTIVES SCORE ALLOTED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORE GIVEN
Safety -5 It is not much safer to use than ds1
Ease of use 8 It is easier to use than ds1 as it don't use any complicated devices
Portable 0 it is similar to ds1 in mobility
Use of standard parts 7 It uses standard parts like conveyor belts, bottle washing mechanism
Cost -9 Budget is very high than ds1

5.2: JUSTIFICATION OF DESIGN 01 (DATUM) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN 3

OBJECTIVES SCORE ALLOTED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORE GIVEN
Safety 10 It is much more safer to use as there are no harmful components are used
Ease of use 8 it is easy to use as it is semiautomatic and can be handled easily
Portable -6 it don't have any facility to be movable
Use of standard parts 7 it uses standard parts like star wheel, sensors, conveyor belt
Cost 0 cost is similar to ds1

5.3: JUSTIFICATION OF DESIGN 01 (DATUM) WITH RESPECT TO DESIGN 04

OBJECTIVES SCORE ALLOTED JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORE GIVEN
Safety 10 it is safer to use as it don't have any harmful components
Ease of use 8 easy to use as there are no complicated devices are used
Portable 12 it is easier to move as it has wheels
Use of standard parts -7 It uses less standard parts than ds1
Cost 9 Cost is affordable

PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

productor arc

REASONS TO CHOOSE DESIGN 4 AS THE FINAL PRODUCT DESIGN

Deign 4, uses the safety measures and it is easily portable and is light weight than other designs. It is easily affordable in the given budget and easy to use as it don't have any complicated devices and don't use any harmful equipments.