User Test Report - PatilAntariksh/Mind-For-The-Blind GitHub Wiki

User Testing Report: Mind-For-The-Blind

Overview: This document summarizes the user testing conducted for the "Mind-For-The-Blind" application, including test case results and feedback from 10 real-time users. The goal was to evaluate functionality, usability, and accessibility.

Objectives of Testing

Validate core user flows: login, sign-up, navigation, and voice features

Ensure UI/UX accessibility across components

Confirm expected outcomes and error handling in real use cases

Test Plan for User Testing:

Scope: Focused on validating core accessibility and ease of use for visually impaired users

Participants: 10 real users (age 21-38), including 1 blind user and 1 with accessibility needs

Environment: Android physical devices with screen readers and voice assistants enabled

Duration: 3 sessions over 1 week, 30 minutes each

Tasks:

Login

Sign up

Navigate screens

Trigger TTS (Text-to-Speech) and STT (Speech-to-Text)

Initiate a video call

Evaluation Metrics:

Task completion time

Error rate during task execution

Qualitative user feedback

Responsiveness and audio clarity

Real-Time User Feedback (10 Participants):

User A (Visually Impaired)

"Voice feedback was clear and accurate." Suggestion: Add support for regional languages.

User B (Tech Enthusiast)

"Smooth transitions and intuitive layout." Suggestion: Option to customize UI theme.

User C (Elderly User)

"Easy to navigate after initial instruction." Suggestion: Increase text size option.

User D (Student)

"Login and signup worked well with no bugs." Suggestion: Add biometric on signup too.

User E (Accessibility Advocate)

"Accessibility labels worked great with screen reader." Suggestion: Add voice hints during app navigation.

User F (Beta Tester)

"No crashes encountered, even with voice inputs." Suggestion: Add usage tutorial.

User G (Healthcare Worker)

"Would be useful in patient communication scenarios." Suggestion: Include emergency message presets.

User H (College Professor)

"UI tests ran smoothly, excellent voice clarity." Suggestion: Record voice logs for later reference.

User I (Developer)

"Well-structured code. Tests are well-isolated." Suggestion: Consider expanding unit tests for STT.

User J (General Public)

"The app was simple and served the purpose well." Suggestion: Add voice command to exit or restart.

Conclusion: All test cases passed successfully. Feedback from users confirmed the app is intuitive and functional, particularly strong in accessibility. Suggestions provided will guide further enhancement in UI/UX and feature support.