Design concept NO |
Objective |
Score Given |
Justification |
1 |
Safety |
– |
It is not safe because the belt can hit user |
|
Ease of Use |
- |
It is easy to use but the effort is required to pull the belt |
|
Portability |
- |
Belt can be weaken after certain days of use |
|
Use of standard parts |
- |
No use of standard parts |
|
Cost |
- |
Cost is cheaper than design 3 |
2 |
Safety |
0 |
It is safe to use |
|
Ease of Use |
0 |
Easy to use |
|
Portability |
+ |
It is little bit heavy from design 3 |
|
Use of standard parts |
- |
It requires extra tyre then design 3 |
|
Cost |
+ |
little but costly from Design 3 |
3 |
Safety |
Datum |
It is safe to use |
|
Ease of Use |
Datum |
It is easy to use |
|
Portability |
Datum |
Movable |
|
Use of standard parts |
Datum |
All parts are available in market |
|
Cost |
Datum |
Cost are affordable |
4 |
Safety |
– |
If the two wheels crash due to gravity or loose connection it can hit user |
|
Ease of Use |
++ |
Easy to use |
|
Portability |
- |
It is not portable compared to Design 3 |
|
Use of standard parts |
- |
No standard parts |
|
Cost |
+ |
Cost is not affordable |