03. CONCEPT SELECTION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - P-division-2020-2021-even/Repo-02 GitHub Wiki
4.1 ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTIVE
| SL.NO | OBJECTIVE | WEIGHTS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliability | 9 |
| 2 | Portability | 7 |
| 3 | User Friendly | 7 |
| 4 | Automatic | 6 |
4.2 PUGH CHART
| SL.NO | DESIGN OBJECTIVE | WEIGHTS | DESIGN 1 | DESIGN 2 | DESIGN 3 | DESIGN4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliability | 9 | ++ | Datum | - | -- |
| 2 | Portability | 7 | + | Datum | + | 0 |
| 3 | User Friendly | 7 | ++ | Datum | 0 | + |
| 4 | Automatic | 6 | 0 | Datum | + | 0 |
| Score (+) | 39 | 13 | 7 | |||
| Score (-) | 0 | 9 | 18 | |||
| Total Score | 39 | 0 | 4 | -11 |
4.3 Justification for marks given to the Concepts/designs
| Design Number | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for score allocated |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliability | 18 | Design 1 is more secure than datum as all its electronic circuits are hidden inside the locker and so it can't be manipulated and it also has loud alarm . |
| Portability | 7 | The design 1 is more portable as its components are tightly intact inside locker which makes it easy to carry and also it is operated on battery | |
| User-Friendly | 14 | The design 1 is much more easy to use and configure than datum due to its simple numeric keypad,which everyone can understand and everyone can easily setup | |
| Automatic | 0 | Both the designs have same level of automation in them |
| Design Number | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for score allocated |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Reliability | 0 | Datum |
| Portability | 0 | Datum | |
| User-Friendly | 0 | Datum | |
| Automatic | 0 | Datum |
| Design Number | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for score allocated |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Reliability | -9 | Design 3 is less secure than datum as all its electronic circuits are not hidden inside the locker and so it can be manipulated |
| Portability | 7 | This operates on battery unlike Datum and design 4 which makes it more portable and carriable anywhere | |
| User-Friendly | 0 | Design 3 and datum both has same level of user friendly | |
| Automatic | 6 | It has almost all the processes automated unlike datum,example automatic lighting after opening door and switching off of light after door closed |
| Design Number | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for score allocated |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Reliability | -18 | Design 4 is very less secure than datum as all its electronic circuits including batteries are not hidden inside the locker and so it can be manipulated |
| Portability | 0 | Same level of portability as Datum | |
| User-Friendly | 7 | More user friendly as it can be unlocked using just a touch of fingerprint | |
| Automatic | 0 | Design 4 and Datum both has same level of automation |
4.4 Selected Design
4.5 Function Clustering
4.6 Subsystem List
| SI No. | Sub Systen |
|---|---|
| 1 | Indication of Process(section) |
| 2 | Reading and authenticating pin(section) |
| 3 | Opening/Closing and visibility of Locker(section) |
4.7 Interaction b/w sub-functions
| Indication of Process(section) | Pin Authentication(section) | Opening/closing and visibility(section) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Interaction(Electrical Energy) | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Material Interaction | ❌ | ❌ |
| Data Interaction | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Spatial Interaction | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Pin Authentication(section) | Indication of Process(section) | Opening/closing and visibility(section) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Interaction(Electrical Energy) | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Material Interaction | ❌ | ❌ |
| Data Interaction | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Spatial Interaction | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Opening/closing and visibility(section) | Indication of Process(section) | Pin authentication(Section) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Interaction(Electrical Energy) | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Material Interaction | ❌ | ❌ |
| Data Interaction | ❌ | ✔️ |
| Spatial Interaction | ✔️ | ✔️ |


