1 |
Power consumption |
5 |
least energy is used to opening of slot for relaxation of spring |
- |
Ease of Use |
3 |
spring can't be restored back automatically ,difficult to adjust |
- |
Portability |
4 |
It is well balanced horizontally |
- |
Maintenance |
4 |
there are less linkages are used ,so less friction occurs so less maintenance |
- |
Cost |
1 |
it has some more cost for building proper base guide and bar guide |
2 |
Power consumption |
3 |
we need to apply the force against spring restoring force so we req some of energy to crush |
- |
Ease of Use |
4 |
it can be restored more easily than first one because of spring rest energy |
- |
Portability |
4 |
it is very well set on the ground and having balance on angles |
- |
Maintenance |
5 |
it has very less main ,because no open bars, no delicate items and no... friction |
- |
Cost |
2 |
some less cost compared to others, use of heavy and complicated... .....mechanism is no there |
3 |
Power consumption |
5 |
highly dependent on gravity ,0 (zero) energy required ,so no power cons |
- |
Ease of Use |
2 |
it is very heavy to lift it again upside , so it is less easy to use ,no.. comfortable |
- |
Portability |
5 |
it is balance well because it is having mass towards gravity |
- |
Maintenance |
4 |
it has to be kept maintained ,oiling slots, linkages etc |
- |
Cost |
1 |
most of heavy materials required more amount, best locking system is costly |
4 |
Power consumption |
3 |
we need more energy to crush by hand , compare to legs hand has less ......energy |
- |
Ease of Use |
1 |
Hand work is difficult for long time duration and quality of crushing |
- |
Portability |
4 |
yes it has good feature of portability |
- |
Maintenance |
5 |
as per work done by hands very low friction take place ,and there are no linkages. |
- |
Cost |
2 |
it having low cost compared to first and third , bec less cost of equiU |