4. Concept Selection and Product Architecture - P-Odd-2022/Repo-17 GitHub Wiki
CONCEPT SELECTION
4.1 WEIGHTAGE GIVEN TO EACH OBJECTIVE
Sl.No |
Objectives |
Weightage |
1. |
Budget |
8 |
2. |
Fabrication of Parts |
7 |
3. |
Semi Automatic |
9 |
4. |
User Friendly |
9 |
5. |
Portability |
6 |
6. |
Different type of Patterns |
8 |
7. |
Power Efficient |
7 |
8. |
Aesthetics |
2 |
9. |
Working Capacity |
6 |
10. |
Smooth Motion Of Bot |
7 |
4.2 PUGH CHART
4.3 Justification for Selected Concept
Concept 1 has been selected based on its overall performance in the PUGH chart. The bot can be manufactured on a lower budget with lesser number of parts to be fabricated. It is convenient to use due to its simple mechanism and architecture. Due to the presence of wheels, the bot has smooth motion which enhances the quality of pattern drawn. The light weight of the bot makes it easily portable.
Sl.No |
Objectives |
Assigned Score |
Justification |
1. |
Budget |
+ |
The selected concept compared to the Datum is cheap |
2. |
Fabrication Of parts |
+ |
The selected concept has less Number of parts compared to the Datum |
3. |
Bot should be semi Automatic |
+ |
The selected Bot is semi automatic and it receives orders through the program |
4. |
User Friendly |
+ |
The selected design when compared to the Datum is simpler to use |
5. |
Portability |
++ |
The selected concept has lesser weight than that of the Datum and can be easily carried place to place |
6. |
Different types Of Patterns |
+ |
The selected concept is more flexible than that of Datum and it can easily draw a wide range of patterns |
7. |
Power efficient |
+ |
The selected concept is more Power efficient compared to the Datum |
8. |
Aesthetics |
+ |
The selected concept has a very nice and clear outlook as compared to the Datum |
9. |
Working Capacity |
- |
The selected concept works for less number of hours as compared to the Datum |
10. |
Smooth Motion Of Bot |
+ |
The selected concept has the smooth motion as compared to the Datum, as it has wheels for smooth transitions |
4.4 Selected Concept
4.5 Functional Clustering
4.6 Sub-System list
S.No |
Sub-System |
1. |
User Input Section |
2. |
Handling and Controlling section |
3. |
Drawing Pattern Section |
4. |
Indication Section |
4.7 Interaction Details
User Input Section |
Handling and controlling system |
Drawing Pattern Section |
Indication Section |
Material Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Digital Interaction |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Special Interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
Handling and controlling system |
Drawing Pattern Section |
Indication Section |
User Input Section |
Material Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Digital Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Special Interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
Drawing Pattern Section |
Indication Section |
User Input Section |
Handling and controlling system |
Material Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Digital Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Special Interaction |
No |
Yes |
No |
Indication Section |
User Input Section |
Handling and controlling system |
Drawing Pattern section |
Material Interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Digital Interaction |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Special Interaction |
No |
Yes |
No |