5. Concept Evaluation and Product Architecture - P-Odd-2022/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki
Weightage of the objectives
| SL.NO | OBJECTIVES | WEIGHTAGE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AESTHETICS | 1 |
| 2 | COST | 6 |
| 3 | SAFETY | 5 |
| 4 | PORTABLE | 3 |
| 5 | MAINTENANCE | 4 |
| 6 | USER FRIENDLY | 2 |
Pugh Chart
| SL.NO | DESIGN OBJECTIVES | WEIGHTAGE | DESIGN 1 | DESIGN 2 | DESIGN 3 | DESIGN 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AESTHETICS | 1 | ++ | + | - | |
| 2 | COST | 9 | - | ++ | D | + |
| 3 | SAFETY | 5 | + | + | A | + |
| 4 | PORTABLE | 3 | - | + | T | + |
| 5 | MAINTENANCE | 4 | - | - | U | -- |
| 6 | USER FRIENDLY | 2 | + | + | M | + |
| +SCORE | 9 | 29 | ||||
| -SCORE | -16 | -4 | -8 | |||
| TOTAL SCORE | -7 | 25 | 11 |
5.1 JUSTIFICATION OF SCORES
According to PUGH chart Model 2 seems to reliable due to efficiency of cost , Saftey, Maintenance, Portable easily, More user friendly, Aethetics. Hence our selected design No is 2.
5.2 SELECTED DESIGN
5.3 FUNCTION CLUSTERING
Subsystems Identified
- Storing unit
- Dispensing unit
- Indicating Unit
5.4 INTERACTION WITH SUBSYSTEM
| Storing unit | Dispensing unit | Indicating unit |
|---|---|---|
| Material interaction | ✓ | X |
| Data interaction | ✓ | X |
| Spatial interaction | X | ✓ |
| Dispensing unit | Storing unit | Indicating unit |
|---|---|---|
| Material interaction | ✓ | X |
| Data interaction | ✓ | ✓ |
| Spatial interaction | X | ✓ |
| Indicating unit | Dispensing unit | Storing unit |
|---|---|---|
| Material interaction | X | X |
| Data interaction | ✓ | X |
| Spatial interaction | ✓ | ✓ |