5.CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE: - P-Odd-2022/Repo-12 GitHub Wiki

5.1 ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTIVE:

SL NO OBJECTIVES WEIGHTS
1. Aesthetics 4
2. Cost 2
3. Installation 1
4. Ease of use 8
5. Maintance 4
6. Safety 6
7. Space 2
8. Durability 3
9. Efficiency 5

5.2 PUGH CHART:

SL NO DESIGN OBJECTIVES WEIGHTAGE DESIGN 1 DESIGN 2 DESIGN 3 DESIGN 4
1. AESTHETICS 4 + - D -
2. COST 7 - - +
3. INSTALLATION 1 + + A -
4. EASE OF USE 8 ++ + +
5. MAINTENENCE 4 + - T -
6. SAFETY 6 + + +
7. SPACE 2 - - U +
8. DURABILITY 3 ++ + -
9. EFFICIENCY 5 + - M -
+ SCORE 42 18 23
- SCORE 09 22 17
TOTAL 33 -04 06

5.3 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE SCORE GIVEN:

SI NO DESIGN OBJECTIVE SOCRE GIVEN JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SCORE GIVEN
1 DESIGN 3 AESTHETICS datum REFERENCE
The Model should be low cost datum REFERENCE
The Model should be easy for installation datum REFERENCE
The model should be easy to use datum REFERENCE
The Model should be easy for maintenance datum REFERENCE
The Model should be safe to use datum REFERENCE
The Model should occupy less space datum REFERENCE
The Model should have high durability datum REFERENCE
The Model should be efficient datum REFERENCE
2 DESIGN 1 AESTHETICS +4 appropriate due to nice look
The Model should be low cost +2 due to low cost materials used
The Model should be easy for installation -1 due to its complexity of model
EASE OF USE +16 model has more hand usable and easy to use
The Model should be easy for maintenance -4 due to its complexity and more hand useable material
The Model should be safe to use +6 it contain non danger items
The Model should occupy less space +2 it occupies less space than design 3
The Model should have high durability +6 it contains good quality material
The Model should be efficient +5 The model is more efficient
2 DESIGN 2 AESTHETICS -4 appropriate due to nice look
The Model should be low cost +2 due to low cost materials used
The Model should be easy for installation -1 due to its complexity of model
EASE OF USE +16 model has more hand usable and easy to use
The Model should be easy for maintenance -4 due to its complexity and more hand useable material
The Model should be safe to use +6 it contain non danger items
The Model should occupy less space +2 it occupies less space than design 3
The Model should have high durability +6 it contains good quality material
The Model should be efficient +5 The model is more efficient
3 DESIGN 4 AESTHETICS -4 appropriate due to its dull look and huge shape
The Model should be low cost +2 due to low cost materials used
The Model should be easy for installation -1 due to its complexity of model
EASE OF USE +8 model has more hand usable and easy to use
The Model should be easy for maintenance -4 due to its complexity and more hand useable material
The Model should be safe to use +6 it contain non danger items
The Model should occupy less space -2 it occupies more space than design 3
The Model should have high durability -3 model is design to keep despinsing items outside
The Model should be efficient -6 The model is less efficient

5.4 SELECTED CONCEPT DESIGN:

IMG_20220128_205641

5.5 FUNCTION CLUSTERING:

Screenshot (37)_084540~2

5.6 SUBSYSTEM LIST:

Sl.no Subsystem
1. User-interface
2. Storing unit
3. Dispensing unit
4. Collecting dispensed item unit

5.7 INTERACTION WITH SUBSYSTEMS:

Screenshot_20220129-104401~2