5.CONCEPT SELECTION - P-Odd-2022/REPO-2 GitHub Wiki
Assigning weights to the objectives
| sl.no | objectives | weights |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cost | 9 |
| 2 | Aesthetics | 3 |
| 3 | User friendly | 8 |
| 4 | Portable | 4 |
| 5 | Safety | 6 |
| 6 | Efficiency | 7 |
| 7 | Materials used | 5 |
Pugh Chart
| sl.no | Design objectives | Weightage | Design1 | Design2 | Design3 | Design4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cost | 9 | Datum | + | - | + |
| 2 | Portable | 4 | Datum | ++ | - | + |
| 3 | Efficiency | 7 | Datum | - | ++ | -- |
| 4 | Safety | 6 | Datum | + | + | + |
| 5 | User friendly | 8 | Datum | + | + | + |
| 6 | Aesthetics | 3 | Datum | + | ++ | -- |
| 7 | Materials required | 5 | Datum | ++ | + | - |
| +score | 0 | 42 | 39 | 14 | ||
| -score | 0 | -7 | -13 | -25 | ||
| Total score | 0 | 35 | 26 | -11 |
Justification of scores
According to pugh chart, model/design 2 seems to be reliable due to efficiency of cost, easily available exterior, material and good quality display.
- Cost: Affordable components within the budgets and easy availability of material.
- Efficiency: Easily playable, simple rules.
- Occupies less space.
Therefore design 2 is our selected design.
Selected Design: Design 2
