5.1CONCEPT EVALUVATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - P-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo16 GitHub Wiki
pugh chart
| design objectives | weights | design 1 | design 2 | design 3 | design 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| safety | 10 | + | ++ | ++ | 0 |
| ease of use | 8 | + | + | + | 0 |
| portablity | 6 | - | - | - | 0 |
| cost | 9 | - | + | - | 0 |
| score | 33 | 21 | 31 | 13 | 0 |
5.0 assigin the weights to objectives
| objectives | weights |
|---|---|
| safety | 10 |
| ease of use | 8 |
| portablity | 6 |
| cost | 9 |
5.1 justification table for score given
| Design no | objective | score allocated | justification for the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | safety | 10 | no risk |
| ease of use | 8 | easy for moulding | |
| portablity | -6 | to big to carry | |
| cost | -9 | cost ineffective | |
| 2 | safety | 20 | no risk |
| ease of use | 8 | most of the things are automated | |
| portablity | -6 | to big to carry | |
| cost | 9 | components cost less | |
| 3 | safety | 20 | no risk |
| ease of use | 8 | easy to use | |
| portablity | -6 | to big to carry | |
| cost | -9 | some parts cost high | |
| 4 | safety | 0 | datum |
| ease of use | 0 | datum | |
| portabilty | 0 | datum | |
| cost | 0 | datum |
SELECTED DESIGN
DESIGN : 2
