5. Concept evaluation and product architecture - P-Division-2022-2023-Odd/Repo01 GitHub Wiki
Pugh chart
Assigning weights to objectives
objectives |
Weights |
Safety |
6 |
Portability |
5 |
Ease of use |
8 |
Cost |
7 |
pugh chart with four different designs
Design Objectives |
Weights |
Design 1 |
Design 2 |
Design 3 |
Design 4 |
Safety |
6 |
0 |
Datum |
++ |
0 |
Portability |
5 |
- |
Datum |
- |
- |
Ease of use |
8 |
+ |
Datum |
- |
++ |
cost |
7 |
0 |
Datum |
0 |
+ |
score(+) |
|
8 |
0 |
12 |
23 |
score(-) |
|
5 |
0 |
13 |
5 |
Total score |
|
3 |
0 |
-1 |
18 |
Justifications for scores given
As design 4 satisfied most of the needs and seemed to be the most feasible for our project, it is being selected as the final design for our prototype.
6.1 Selected design

6.2 Functional Clustering

6.3Interaction between subsystems
Storage unit |
Interface unit |
Dispensing unit |
Crushing unit |
Material interaction |
no |
yes |
yes |
Data interaction |
Yes |
no |
no |
Spatial interaction |
no |
yes |
no |
Interface unit |
Storage unit |
Dispensing unit |
Crushing unit |
Material interaction |
no |
no |
no |
Data interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Spatial interaction |
no |
no |
no |
Dispensing unit |
Storage unit |
Interface unit |
Crushing unit |
Material interaction |
Yes |
no |
Yes |
Data interaction |
no |
Yes |
no |
Spatial interaction |
Yes |
no |
no |
Crushing unit |
Storage unit |
Interface unit |
Dispensing unit |
Material interaction |
Yes |
no |
Yes |
Data interaction |
no |
Yes |
no |
Spatial interaction |
no |
no |
no |