Pug Chart - P-Division-2018-2019/Team-6 GitHub Wiki
Below are the identified and prioritised objectives.
- 1.Rugged in nature
- 2.Durable
- 3.Easy to use
- 4.Cost effective
Assign weightage for the stated objectives.
Objectives | Weightage |
---|---|
Rugged in nature | 8 |
Durable | 7 |
Easy to use | 5 |
Cost effective | 3 |
Pug Chart
Objectives | Weightage | Design idea 1 | Design idea 2 | Design idea 3 | Design idea 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rugged in nature | 8 | ++ | Datum | + | - |
Durable | 7 | + | Datum | - | + |
Easy to use | 5 | ++ | Datum | -- | + |
Cost effective | 3 | - | Datum | -- | + |
+Score | +33 | 0 | +8 | 15 | |
-Score | -3 | 0 | -23 | -8 | |
Total | +30 | 0 | -15 | 7 |
The Best Concept selected is Design No.1
Justification:
Design idea no | Objective | Score Given | Justification |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rugged in nature | +16 | open belt drive is used to excavate soil,use of standard parts |
Durable | +7 | long life of belt drive | |
Easy to use | +10 | used through remote control and low maintenance of belt drive | |
Cost effective | -3 | standard parts used,hence amount of iron used is more | |
3 | Rugged in nature | +8 | robotics legs makes bot stable |
Durable | -7 | amount of power required is high by this bot | |
Easy to use | -10 | movement of bot(legs) is slow | |
Cost effective | -6 | has the robotic legs & camera is used so its more expensive | |
4 | Rugged in nature | -8 | |
Durable | +7 | ||
Easy to use | +5 | ||
Cost effective | +3 |