5.CONCEPT EVALUATION - P-Div-Engg-Exploration-Odd-2026-27/Repo-11 GitHub Wiki
<style>
</style>
| Design Objective | WEIGHTS | POP UP | CAR ROBOT | FLOATING | DOG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.safety | 9 | “+” | “+” | Datum | “+” |
| 2.ease of use | 7 | “+” | “+” | Datum | “-“ |
| 3.portability | 5 | “-“ | “+” | Datum | “-“ |
| 4.Use of stand parts | 1 | “+” | “_” | Datum | “+” |
| 5.Cost | 1 | “+” | “_” | Datum | “-“ |
PUGH CHART FOR FIVE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
selected design
justification
| Task 3 : Justification for the scores given | |||||
| Design No. | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for the Score | ||
| 1 | Safety | 7 | |||
| Ease of use | 7 | user friendly | |||
| Portability | 8 | portable as it is easy to carry | |||
| Use of standard parts | 3 | highly standard parts are used | |||
| Cost | 4 | cost is quite a lot | |||
| 2 | Safety | 8 | high saftey | ||
| Ease of use | 7 | easy to use as information can be seen on the screen | |||
| Portability | 5 | easy to move as it has wheels | |||
| Use of standard parts | 1 | highly standard parts are used | |||
| Cost | 3 | cost is minimal | |||
| 3 | Safety | 6 | magentic field effect | ||
| Ease of use | 7 | user friendly | |||
| Portability | 1 | less portable as it has effect of magnetic field | |||
| Use of standard parts | 1 | highly standard parts are used | |||
| Cost | 1 | cost is high becacause magnet are used to float the robot | |||
| 4 | Safety | 5 | complicated circuiting | ||
| Ease of use | 7 | user friendly | |||
| Portability | 4 | easily portable | |||
| Use of standard parts | 1 | highly standard parts are used | |||
| Cost | 2 | affordable | |||
| 5 | Safety | 8 | it has precised movements | ||
| Ease of use | 9 | easily accessible to the user | |||
| Portability | 7 | easy to move due to wheels | |||
| Use of standard parts | 2 | highly standard parts are used | |||
| Cost | 4 | affordable |