5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - P-Div-Engg-Exploration-Odd-2026-27/Repo-04 GitHub Wiki
| Design Objectives | Weights | Design 1 | Design 2 | Design 3 | Design 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 9 | Datum | + | 0 | + |
| Ease of use | 7 | Datum | + | + | 0 |
| Portability | 5 | Datum | + | + | + |
| Use of standard | 6 | Datum | 0 | + | 0 |
| Cost | 6 | Datum | + | + | + |
| Score(+) | 0 | 27 | 24 | 20 | |
| Score(-) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 0 | 27 | 24 | 20 |
| Design No. | Objective | Score Allocated | Justification for the Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design 1 | Safety | Datum | Reference design used for comparison |
| Design 1 | Ease of use | Datum | Reference design used for comparison |
| Design 1 | Portability | Datum | Reference design used for comparison |
| Design 1 | Use of standard parts | Datum | Reference design used for comparison |
| Design 1 | Cost | Datum | Reference design used for comparison |
| Design 2 | Safety | 8 | Improved safety compared with the datum design |
| Design 2 | Ease of use | 8 | Simple controls and easy operation |
| Design 2 | Portability | 8 | Compact and easy to carry |
| Design 2 | Use of standard parts | 7 | Uses standard components where practical; similar to datum |
| Design 2 | Cost | 8 | Expected to be more cost-effective than the datum |
| Design 3 | Safety | 7 | Safety is comparable to the datum design |
| Design 3 | Ease of use | 8 | Simple mechanism makes it easy to operate |
| Design 3 | Portability | 8 | Compact structure supports portability |
| Design 3 | Use of standard parts | 8 | Uses commonly available standard parts |
| Design 3 | Cost | 8 | Standard parts help keep cost manageable |
| Design 4 | Safety | 8 | Improved safety compared with the datum design |
| Design 4 | Ease of use | 7 | Ease of use is comparable to the datum design |
| Design 4 | Portability | 8 | Compact design is easy to move |
| Design 4 | Use of standard parts | 7 | Standard-part use is comparable to the datum design |
| Design 4 | Cost | 8 | Expected to be more cost-effective than the datum |
| Subsystem 1 | Subsystem 2 | Subsystem 3 | Interaction Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial | yes | yes | The body unit and the sensing unit are connected to the leg unit to work as a system. |
| Data | yes | no | The leg unit and sensing unit interact or work through signals, but it is not connected to the body. |
| Material | no | yes | The leg unit is connected to the body unit by joints to make a mechanism. |
| Subsystem 2 | Subsystem 1 | Subsystem 3 | Interaction Details |
| Spatial | no | yes | The sensing unit is physically mounted on the body unit. |
| Data | yes | yes | The body unit or leg unit move because of the sensing unit, which gives or transfers signal. |
| Material | yes | no | The body provides mechanical support to the sensing unit. |
| Subsystem 3 | Subsystem 1 | Subsystem 2 | Interaction Details |
| Spatial | yes | yes | The sensor is mounted on the body and the leg unit is physically connected to the body. |
| Data | no | yes | The sensor communicates through signals with body whereas leg unit doesn't communicate with body through signals. |
| Material | yes | yes | Both are connected through joint linkages to the body unit. |