5. CONCEPT EVALUATION, SELECTION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - O-Division-2024-25-Odd/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki

5.1. PUGH CHART

Design Objectives	Weights	Design 1	Design 2	Design 3	Design 4
Safety	9	datum	(-)	(+)	(-)
Ease of use	7	datum	(+)	(++)	(-)
Portability	5	datum	(+)	(-)	(+)
Use of standard parts	6	datum	0	(++)	(+)
Cost	6	datum	0	(++)	(+)
Score(+)			12	47	17
Score (-)			9	5	16
Total			3	42	1

5.2] JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORES

Design No.	Objective	Score Allocated	Justification For The Score
1	Safety		datum
	Ease of Use		datum
	Portability		datum
	Use of Standard Parts		datum
	Cost		datum
2	Safety	9	Safe o use
	Ease of Use	7	requires human labor
	Portability	5	Heavy machine and occupies more volume, so not easily portable
	Use of Standard Parts	0	Same as datum
	Cost	0	Same as datum
3	Safety	9	Safe to use
	Ease of Use	14	Easy to use because of automated robotic arm
	Portability	5	Heavy machine and occupies more volume, so not easily portable
	Use of Standard Parts	12	They have generic functions, and more programming and electricity is required
	Cost	-	Cost is more because of complex design
4	Safety	9	Not that safe compared to others as this model doesn't has that much automation
	Ease of Use	7	Requires human labor
	Portability	5	Heavy machine and occupies more volume, so not easily portable
	Use of Standard Parts	6	Doesn't require much of standard parts
	Cost	6

5.3] FUNCTIONAL CLUSTERING & SUBSYSTEM IDENTIFICATION

FUNCTION CLUSTERING

Screenshot 2024-10-24 163956

SUBSYSTEM IDENTIFICATION

5.4] SUBSYSTEM INTERACTION