3.Concept evaluation and Selected concept - O-Division-2020-2021-Even/Repo-5 GitHub Wiki

Pugh chart

DESIGN OBJECTIVE	WEIGHTS	DESIGN 1	DESIGN 2	DESIGN 3	DESIGN 4
SAFETY	7	++	DATUM	+	-
EASE OF USE	6	+	DATUM	-	+
PORTABILITY	6	+	DATUM	-	+
USE OF STANDARD PARTS	5	+	DATUM	-	+
COST	4	-	DATUM	+	-
SCORES(+)		31	0	11	17
SCORES(-)		-4	0	-17	-11
TOTAL		27	0	-6	6

DESIGN NO.	OBJECTIVES	SCORE ALLOCATED	JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORES
1.	SAFETY	++	Design 1 is safe as it will sense the hand
	EASE OF USE	+	No human effort needed
	PORTABILITY	+	As it is small in size
	USE OF STANDARD PARTS	+	Has used the parts with accuracy
	COST	-	As per the cost given by the user this is the good choice so that we can approach the constraint of the user
2.	SAFETY	0	As compared to the selected design it is the design which is not much securable
	EASE OF USE	0	It is not easy to use compared to selected design
	PORTABILITY	0	It is also portable but the volume which we hold feels uncomfortable
	USE OF STANDARD PARTS	0	Here the components can be reused for other equipment
	COST	0	Here the cost becomes very expensive as we have to mount it on wall
3.	SAFETY	+	It is easy to use as the conveyer belt will complete the work
	EASE OF USE	-	It is not easy to use compared to selected design
	PORTABILITY	-	it too big for transportation
	USE OF STANDARD PARTS	-	Here the parts are not used to their full extent
	COST	+	As per the cost given by the user this is the good choice
4.	SAFETY	-	It is less safe compared to the selected design
	EASE OF USE	+	Easy to use as no human effort needed
	PORTABILITY	+	Easy to port as it is small in size
	USE OF STANDARD PARTS	+	Here the parts are used upto their required extent
	COST	-	Cost is big compared to the selected design

WhatsApp Image 2021-07-29 at 2 41 56 PM