Home - O-Division-2018-2019/Team-15 GitHub Wiki
PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE
![]()
Prioritized objectives
- Polishing
- Cleaning
- Ease of use
- Time duration
- Cost efficient
Assign weightage for the stated Objectives
Objectives | Weightage |
---|---|
Polishing | 9 |
Cleaning | 8 |
Ease of use | 7 |
Time duration | 6 |
Cost efficient | 5 |
PUGH Chart
Objectives | Weightage | Design Idea 1 | Design Idea 2 | Design Idea 3 | Design Idea 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polishing | 9 | Datum | - | 0 | - |
Cleaning | 8 | Datum | 0 | -- | - |
Ease of use | 7 | Datum | + | - | 0 |
Time duration | 6 | Datum | 0 | + | + |
cost efficient | 5 | Datum | -- | 0 | + |
+Score | 0 | 7 | 6 | 11 | |
-Score | 0 | 19 | 23 | 17 | |
Total | 0 | -12 | -17 | -6 |
The best Concept is:Design 1
Justifications
Design Idea No. | Objectives | Score given | Justifications |
---|---|---|---|
2 | Polishing | -1 | The design 2 has square brushes which polishes at a particular place in shoe but in design 1 it has rolling brushes which polishes shoes properly |
cleaning | -2 | The design 2 does not clean the shoe when compared to datum | |
Ease of use | 1 | It is very easy to operate. | |
Time duration | 0 | Time duration for both design 1 and 2 is same. | |
Cost efficient | -2 | It costs more when compared to datum. | |
3 | Polishing | 0 | The both design 1 and 3 polishing same.It polishes perfectly. |
cleaning | -1 | The design 3 does not clean the shoe properly compared to design 1. | |
Ease of use | 0 | The design 1 and 3 are user friendly. | |
Time duration | +1 | The design 3 takes less time to clean and polish when compared to design 1. | |
Cost efficient | 0 | The design 1 and 3 costs same. | |
4 | Polishing | -1 | The design 4 has only one polish brush which does not polish properly compared to datum. |
Cleaning | -2 | The does not clean the shoes properly. | |
Ease of use | + | It is very easy to operate when compared to datum | |
Time duration | -2 | It takes more time to clean and polish. | |
Cost efficient | +1 | The design 4 costs less. |