5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - N-division-2021-2022-even/Repo-16 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

5.1 ASSIGN WEIGHTS TO THE OBJECTIVE

SI NO	Objectives	Weights
1	Safety	7
2	Ease of use	6
3	Portability	3
4	Use of standard parts	5
5	Cost	4

5.2 PUGH CHART FOR THE 4 ALTERNATIVES

SI NO	Design Objectives	Weights	Vrashabh	Jairaj	Harsha	Vijay
1	Safety	8	-	DATUM	++	+
2	Easy of use	6	++	DATUM	+	_
3	Maintanance	5	+	DATUM	-	++
4	Use of standard parts	9	-	DATUM	++	+
5	Cost	5	++	DATUM	-	+
	Score(+)		27		40	32
	Score(-)		17		10	06
	Total		10		30	26

5.3 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SCORE GIVEN

Design No	Objective	Score alocated	Justification for the Score
HARSHA	Safety	8	Very easy to handle
	Ease of use	6	No complications in using
	Portability	7	Easily portable
	Use of standard part	7	Usage of standard parts
	Cost	8	Feasable
JAIRAJ	Safety	8	Very safe
	Ease of use	8	Easy to use
	Portability	0	Bit difficulty to move except rope
	Use of standard part	0	No change in level of using the standard parts
	Cost	8	Cost effective
VIJAY	Safety	0	-
	Ease of use	0	-
	Portability	0	-
	Use of standard part	0	-
	Cost	0	-
VRASHAB	Safety	8	Safe to use
	Ease of use	8	No difficulty in handling
	Portability	0	Difficult to move because of mechanical arms
	Use of standard part	0	Same level as that datum
	Cost	0	Cost will approximateto same as that of datum

5.4 SELECTED DESIGN

5.5 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

5.6 FUNCTION CLUSTERING

5.7 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

Moving Unit	Carrying Unit	Indication Unit
Material	+	-
Data	-	+
Spatial	+	-

Carrying Unit	Indication Unit	Moving Unit
Material	-	+
Data	+	-
Spatial	-	+

Indication Unit	Moving Unit	Carrying Unit
Material	-	-
Data	+	+
Spatial	-	-