5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - N-div-2026-27-Odd/Repo-02 GitHub Wiki

5. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

Task 1: Assign Weights to Objectives

Objectives Weights
Safety 9
Ease of Use 7
Portability 5
Use of Standard Parts 6
Cost 6

Task 2: Pugh Chart for Four Alternative Designs

Design Objectives Weights Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4
Safety 9 0 1 0 1
Ease of Use 7 0 1 1 1
Portability 5 0 -1 1 0
Use of Standard Parts 6 0 1 0 1
Cost 6 0 -1 1 0
Score (+) 0 22 18 22
Score (-) 0 11 0 0
Total Score 0 11 18 22

Task 3: Concept Evaluation

The Pugh chart is used to compare four alternative designs based on five objectives: safety, ease of use, portability, use of standard parts, and cost.

The objectives are assigned weights according to their importance. Each design is evaluated using the following ratings:

  • +1: Better than the reference design
  • 0: Equal to the reference design
  • -1: Worse than the reference design

The positive score is calculated by adding the weights of objectives rated +1. The negative score is calculated by adding the weights of objectives rated -1. The total score is obtained by subtracting the negative score from the positive score.

Task 4: Result and Conclusion

Design 1 obtains a total score of 0, Design 2 obtains 11, Design 3 obtains 18, and Design 4 obtains 22.

Therefore, Design 4 is selected as the preferred alternative because it achieves the highest total score of 22 among the four designs.