3.CONCEPTUAL_DESIGN - N-Division-2019-2020-Even/Repo-17 GitHub Wiki
FUNCTIONS:
HANDLE WOOL:
1.Store wool.
2.Sense the wool.
3.Holding the wool.
4.To and fro dispense of wool.
HANDLE SPOOL:
1.Hold the spool.
2.Sense the spool.
3.Rotation of spool.
4.Maintaining uniform speed.
INDICATIONS:
1.Machine ON/OFF.
2.To enter the number of turns.
3.To display number of turns.
FUNCTION TREE:
FUNCTION CLUSTER
MORPHOLOGICAL CHART:
Function | Mean 1 | Mean 2 | Mean 3 | Mean 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ON/OFF Mechanism | Rocker switch![]() |
Slider Switch![]() |
Toggle Switch![]() |
|
Sensing wool | Optical IR Sensor![]() |
Proximity Sensor![]() |
Electro-Mechanical Sensor![]() |
Capacitive Sensor![]() |
Holding wool | Horizontally |
Vertically![]() |
Bowl![]() |
|
Holding spool | Cylindrical Spool |
Cone shaped spool |
||
Count number of Winds | Recording Rotation Counter![]() |
LED Counter Meter with Proximity Sensor![]() |
||
Communication Module | Input through keyboard![]() |
Bluetooth Module![]() |
||
Process Completion Indication | Beeper![]() |
LED |
Vibration Module![]() |
Conceptual Design-1:
Conceptual Design-2:
Conceptual Design-3:
Conceptual Design-4:
WEIGHTAGE ASSIGNMENT :
OBJECTIVES | WEIGHTAGE |
---|---|
Safety | 9 |
Ease of Use | 8 |
Cost | 7 |
Use of Standard Parts | 5 |
Displaying Details | 4 |
PUGH CHART :
OBJECTIVES | WEIGHTAGE | DESIGN-1 | DESIGN-2 | DESIGN-3 | DESIGN-4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Safety | 9 | Datum | 0 | + | - |
Ease of use | 8 | Datum | - | + | 0 |
Cost | 7 | Datum | - | 0 | 0 |
Use of Standard Parts | 5 | Datum | - | + | - |
Display Details | 4 | Datum | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+ Score | 0 | 22 | |||
- Score | 0 | -20 | -14 | ||
TOTAL | 0 | -20 | 22 | -14 |
CONCEPT SELECTION :
JUSTIFICATIONS :
DESIGN IDEA | OBJECTIVE | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Safety | Datum | Less Safer as an Open Blade is used |
Ease of Use | Datum | Complex mechanism | |
Cost | Datum | Use of expensive parts | |
Use of standard Parts | Datum | Many parts used which are not easily available | |
Display Details | Datum | Display system is expensive |
DESIGN IDEA | OBJECTIVE | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
2 | Safety | 0 | Similar to datum |
Ease of Use | - | Cannot control many aspects of this design | |
Cost | - | Number of parts used is more | |
Use of standard Parts | - | Parts might not be easily available | |
Display Details | 0 | Similar to datum |
DESIGN IDEA | OBJECTIVE | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
3 | Safety | + | Cutting mechanism is safer |
Ease of Use | + | More efficient than datum | |
Cost | 0 | Similar to datum | |
Use of standard Parts | + | Parts easily available | |
Display Details | 0 | Same as datum |
DESIGN IDEA | OBJECTIVE | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
---|---|---|---|
4 | Safety | - | Cutting mechanism might be unsafe |
Ease of Use | 0 | Similar to datum | |
Cost | 0 | Same as datum | |
Use of standard Parts | - | Number of parts used is more | |
Display Details | 0 | Similar to datum |
Selected Concept is Design idea 3