7_Competitor's site Audits - MoSanogo/Project-8- GitHub Wiki

In this section we discuss about competitor's site Audits.

Audits Runtime Settings

  • URL: http://todolistme.net/.
  • Device: Emulated Nexus 5X.
  • Network throttling: 150 ms TCP RTT, 1,638.4 Kbps throughput (Simulated).
  • CPU throttling: 4x slowdown (Simulated).
  • User agent (host):Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/78.0.3904.97 Safari/537.36.
  • User agent (network): Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 6.0.1; Nexus 5 Build/MRA58N) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/74.0.3694.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 Chrome-Lighthouse.
  • CPU/Memory Power: 678.

competior's_site_audits_runtime_setting

Competitor's Site Audits Runtime Settings

Audits Results

A_Summary

The range time of recording:0~45.04 s

  • Page Loading time (milliseconds): 128 ms.
  • Scripting time(milliseconds): 4354 ms.
  • Rendering time(milliseconds): 295 ms.
  • Painting: 893 ms.
  • System : 2399 ms.
  • Idle: 36972 ms.
  • Total:45041 ms.

competitor's_site_audits_overview

Competitor's Site Audits Overview

competitor's_site_audits_summary. Competitor's Site Audits Summary

B_Performance

According the Lighthouse Audits ,the performance of the competitor's site is 79 based on the Audits Runtime Settings mentioned above.

B_1 Metrics

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s.
  • Speed Index: 3.9 s.
  • Time to Interactive: 5.8 s.
  • First Meaningful Paint: 1.5 s.
  • First CPU Idle: 5.5 s.
  • Max Potential First Input Dela: 620 ms.

B_2 Opportunity

  • Preconnect to required origins.

https://github.com/MoSanogo/Project-8-/blob/master/images/competior's_site_audits_performance_0.png

Competitor's Site Audits Perfomance_0

C_Accessibility

C_1 Accessibility score : 38

C_2 Opportunity

  • Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

  • [id] attributes on the page are not unique.

  • <frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title.

  • Image elements do not have [alt] attributes.

  • Form elements do not have associated labels.

  • <html> element does not have a [lang] attribute.

competitor's_site_accessibility

Competitor's Site Audits Accessibility

D_Best Practices.

D_1 Best Practices score : 71

D_2 Opportunity

  • The competitor's app does not use HTTPS .

All sites should be protected with HTTPS, even ones that don't handle sensitive data.

  • It does not use HTTP/2 for all of its resources.

  • Uses document.write(). For users on slow connections, external scripts dynamically injected via document.write() can delay page load by tens of seconds.

  • It includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities such as [email protected](Vulnerability Count:2).

competior's_site_audits_best_practices.

Competitor's Site Audits Best Practices

E_SEO

E_1 SEO : 64

E_2 Opportunity

  • The competitor app does not have a tag with width or initial-scale.

  • The app doesn't use legible font sizes.

  • Tap targets are not sized appropriately.

  • The does not have a meta description.

  • Image elements do not have [alt] attributes.

competior's_site_audits_seo

Competitor's Site Audits Seo

Next

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️