GM Replacement Process - MLROOTC/MLR-OOTC GitHub Wiki
The team is allowed to nominate one internal candidate, which LOMs will vet and approve or disapprove
Create a group chat with LOMs and the candidate
Ask questions about their experience, why they want to be GM, etc.
Things to look out for:
Does the candidate have experience managing or leading a group of people online?
Do they have any examples of time management and communication skills to stay on top of AB timers
Do they have a good understanding of the rules of the game via being a MiLR GM, co-GM, umpire, etc.
How likely are they to fly off the handle when an in game decision doesn’t go their way?
Is any form of past leadership sticking around to help give them guidance, particularly if any of the above areas are lacking?
Ask if there is anyone they would like us to talk to as a reference
Reach out to references via DMs and share screenshots with LOM chat
If LOMs approve of the candidate, it will go to a team approval vote, and must have 75% in favor of the candidate
If the candidate has been co-GM for at least 3 sessions, they need 50% approval to become permanent candidate
If they have not, the candidate needs 75% approval
If the candidate does not receive the required votes, continue on to the external replacement process
LOMs will get a list of external candidates together by polling the potential GMs channel in main or reaching out to individuals that may be good candidates
LOMs will have a ranked choice vote on all candidates. The top three will be presented to the team
LOMs and candidates should join the team server, and have the interim GM create a channel for team members, potential GMs, and LOMs only
For the next 24 hours, the candidates may make a speech and the team is allowed to ask questions
Once the 24 hour question period is up, the team will vote on candidates
It should be a ranked choice vote for the three possible candidates