4.B JUSTIFICATION - M-Division-2020-2021-Even/Repo_13 GitHub Wiki
4.B JUSTIFICATION :
Design 1 :
| Objectives | Score Allocated | Justification of score |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | (--) | spring in it is more strong and should be held properly |
| Cost | (+) | Comapring with design 3 cost estimation is less |
| User-friendly | (-) | Spring should is pulled back manually sometimes |
| Portability | (+) | Model is small hence easily portable |
| Size | (+) | Size of Design 1 is smaller compared to Design 3 |
Design 2 :
| Objectives | Score Allocated | Justification of score |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | (+) | The motor is held tightly inside the model, safety is more |
| Cost | (++) | Only one motor is used compared to two in Design 3 |
| User-friendly | (+) | The model can be easily operated by the buttons provided |
| Portability | (0) | Model is not be easily portable |
| Size | (+) | Size of Design 2 is smaller compared to Design 3 |
Design 3 :
| Objectives | Score Allocated | Justification of score |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | Datum | ----------- |
| Cost | Datum | ----------- |
| User-friendly | Datum | ----------- |
| Portability | Datum | ----------- |
| Size | Datum | ----------- |
Design 4 :
| Objectives | Score Allocated | Justification of score |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | (+) | The motor is held tightly inside the model, safety is more |
| Cost | (+) | Comapring with design 3 cost estimation is less |
| User-friendly | (+) | The model can be easily operated by the buttons provided |
| Portability | (0) | Model is not be easily portable |
| Size | (+) | Size of Design 2 is smaller compared to Design 3 |