4.B JUSTIFICATION - M-Division-2020-2021-Even/Repo_12 GitHub Wiki
4.B.1 JUSTIFICATIONS :
Design Idea 1 :
Objectives | Score allocated | Justification of score |
---|---|---|
Portability | -3 | This machine isn't portable as that of datum |
Safety | 4 | This machine can assure you the safety same as that of the datum |
Aesthetics | 5 | For external look, this device is good enough when compared with datum |
Cost | -2 | With respect to cost management device costs high in market because of its external look |
Ease of use | 2 | This device can launch the ball easily |
Maintenance | 3 | This machine don't require much maintenance |
Space consumed | -3 | This device would consume more space than the datum |
Design Idea 2 :
Objectives | Score allocated | Justification of score |
---|---|---|
Portability | -2 | The machine is not portable as that of datum |
Safety | 3 | The machine's safety factor is good |
Aesthetics | -1 | Machine is not aesthetically appealing as compared to datum |
Cost | 4 | The device cost is bearable |
Ease of use | -3 | Its not so easy to use as compared to datum |
Maintenance | 2 | It is easy to maintain because of its small size |
Space consumed | -1 | The space consumed is a little more compared to datum |
Design Idea 3 :
Objectives | Score allocated | Justification of score |
---|---|---|
Portability | -2 | The machine is heavy compared to datum |
Safety | 2 | The machine is safe to use |
Aesthetics | -3 | The machine look is not so good as compared to datum |
Cost | 3 | The cost can be managed |
Ease of use | 1 | The device is somewhat complicated to use |
Maintenance | 3 | The device is easy to maintain |
Space consumed | -1 | The space consumed is a bit more compared to datum |