CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - M-Division-2019-20-Even/Repo-09 GitHub Wiki
FUNCTIONAL TREE

FUNCTIONAL TREE CLUSTERING

MORPHOLOGICAL CHART
clustr functn.png
WEIGHTAGE FOR THE OBJECTIVES
| SR.NO | Objectives | Weightage |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Machine should be semi-automatic | 6 |
| 2 | Machine should be portable | 2 |
| 3 | Machine should be hygienic | 8 |
| 4 | Machine should be user-friendly | 7 |
| 5 | Machine should be as compact as possible | 4 |
PUGH CHART
| SR.NO | Objectives | Weightage | Desgin 1 | Design 2 | Desing 3 | Design 4 | Design 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Machine should be semi-automatic | 6 | ++ | 0 | DATUM | + | + |
| 2 | Machine should be portable | 2 | 0 | - | DATUM | - | ++ |
| 3 | Machine should be hygienic | 8 | 0 | 0 | DATUM | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Machine should be user friendly | 7 | + | 0 | DATUM | 0 | + |
| 5 | Machine should be as compact as possible | 4 | 0 | + | DATUM | - | + |
| + score | 19 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 21 | ||
| - score | 0 | -2 | 0 | -6 | 0 | ||
| Total | 19 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
JUSTIFICATION
Design 1

| OBJECTIVES | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
|---|---|---|
| Machine should be semi-automatic | 12 | Dough is easily got from the container |
| Machine should be portable | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be hygienic | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be user-friendly | + | easier to operate than datum |
| Machine should be as compact as possible | 0 | Similar to datum |
Design 2

| OBJECTIVES | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
|---|---|---|
| Machine should be semi-automatic | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be portable | -2 | is very difficult to carry |
| Machine should be hygienic | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be user-friendly | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be as compact as possible | + | is more compact compared to datum |
Design 3

| OBJECTIVES | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
|---|---|---|
| Machine should be semi-automatic | Datum | |
| Machine should be portable | Datum | |
| Machine should be hygienic | Datum | |
| Machine should be user-friendly | Datum | |
| Machine should be as compact as possible | Datum |
Design 4

| OBJECTIVES | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
|---|---|---|
| Machine should be semi-automatic | 6 | Dough is easily got from the container |
| Machine should be portable | -2 | it's difficult to move |
| Machine should be hygienic | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be user-friendly | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be as compact as possible | -4 | is very large |
Design 5

| OBJECTIVES | SCORE GIVEN | JUSTIFICATION |
|---|---|---|
| Machine should be semi-automatic | 6 | Dough is easily got from the container |
| Machine should be portable | 4 | Since the is not very large, it is easily portable |
| Machine should be hygienic | 0 | Similar to datum |
| Machine should be user-friendly | 7 | easier to operate than datum |
| Machine should be as compact as possible | 4 | More compact than datum |
SELECTION OF DESIGN
- According to the PUGH chat, design 5 scores the highest and is the best of the 5 designs. Therefore design 5 is selected.
