4.0 Concept selection and Product Architecture - L-division-2020-2021-odd/Repo-04 GitHub Wiki

PUGH Chart

Design Objectives	Weights	design 1	design2	design 3	design4
user friendly	7	datum	(++)	(++)	(++)
portable	3	datum	(+)	(+)	(+)
aesthetics	5	datum	(+)	(++)	(+)
location	2	datum	(+)	(+)	(+)
cost	3	datum	(+)	(+)	0
Score(+)	0	27	32	24
Score (-)	0	0	0
Total	0	27	32	24

Design No.	Objective	Score Allocated	Justification for the Score
1	user friendly	0	easy to use as there is no complication in playing it
	portable	0	easily portable
	aesthetics	0	elegant arts
	location	0	can be placed at spacious place
	cost	0	pocket friendly
2	user friendly	(++)	very easy to handle
	portable	(+)	as the instruments are not having complicated structures so they easily portable
	aesthetics	(-)	no much arts on it
	location	(+)	can be placed at spacious place
	cost	(+)	costs more compared to design 1
3	user friendly	(++)	easy to manage and attractive
	portable	(+)	easily portable compared to design1
	aesthetics	(++)	more attractive
	location	(+)	can be placed in spacious place
	cost	(+)	it is cost effective
4	user friendly	(++)	easy to handle
	portable	(+)	easily portable
	aesthetics	(+)	looks elegant
	location	(+)	can be placed in spacious place
	cost	(-)	complicated instruments so costs quite more