3. Conceptual Design and Product Architecture - L-division-2019-2020-Even/Repo-13 GitHub Wiki

2. Conceptual Design and Product Architecture

Fig 3.1.1

Fig 3.2.1

Moping Indication User options Casting

Fig 3.3.1

Fig 3.4.1.1 Fig 3.4.1.2

Fig 3.4.2

Fig 3.4.3

Fig 3.4.4

Objective	Weightage	Design Idea 1	Design Idea 2	Design Idea 3	Design Idea 4
Mop floor	9	0	Datum	0	0
Hygienic	8	0	Datum	0	0
Aesthetic	7	++	Datum	-	+
Easy to use	6	++	Datum	+	+
Use of standard parts	5	--	Datum	-	-
lightweight	3	+	Datum	-	-
Battery	2	0	Datum	0	0
+ score		29	0	6	13
- score		5	0	15	8
Total		24	0	-9	-5

Design Idea	Objective	Score given	justification
1	Mop floor		0
	Hygienic	0	It works hygienically
	Aesthetic	++	It can be customized with different designs.
	Easy to use	++	Easy to use even for the common man
	Use of standard parts	--	It contains some extra parts
	lightweight	0	It has more components to heavy more than datum
	Battery	+	Uses less energy
2	Mop floor	Datum	It can mop efficiently
	Hygienic	Datum	It works hygienically
	Aesthetic	Datum	It can be customized and good looking
	Easy to use	Datum	Easy to use with little knowledge
	Use of standard parts	Datum	It contains standard parts
	lightweight	Datum	It has a reasonable weight
	Battery	Datum	Uses some
3	Mop floor	0	It can mop efficiently
	Hygienic	0	It works hygienically
	Aesthetic	-	It can be customized and looks simple and neat
	Easy to use	+	Easy to use only work is to change the mop
	Use of standard parts -	It has components which are hard to find
	lightweight	+	It has fewer components to reduce weight
	Battery	0	Uses the same energy as a datum
4	Mop floor	0	It can mop efficiently
	Hygienic	0	It works hygienically
	Aesthetic	+	It can be customized with designs.
	Easy to use	+	Easy to use only work is to change the mop and check smooth movement of motor
	Use of standard parts -	It contains some different chasey design
	lightweight	+	It has fewer components to reduce weight
	Battery	0	Uses the same energy as the datum

Fig 3.4.1.1 Fig 3.4.1.2