4.Concept generation and product architecture - K-Division-2021-2022-Even/Repo-15 GitHub Wiki
Assigning weights to the objectives
| objectives | weights |
|---|---|
| Ease of use | 10 |
| Ease of portability | 9 |
| Indicating machine On/Off | 8 |
| Works 24/7 | 7 |
| Semi automatic | 6 |
| Safety | 5 |
| Cost | 4 |
| Aesthetically pleasing | 3 |
Pugh chart
| design objectives | Weights | Design 1 | Design 2 | Design 3 | Design 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 10 | 0 | + | DATUM | + |
| Ease of portability | 9 | 0 | -- | DATUM | -- |
| Indicating machine On/Off | 8 | 0 | - | DATUM | - |
| Works 24/7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | DATUM | 0 |
| Semi automatic | 6 | 0 | 0 | DATUM | 0 |
| Safety | 5 | 0 | - | DATUM | - |
| Cost | 4 | - | 0 | DATUM | - |
| Aesthetically pleasing | 3 | 0 | + | DATUM | + |
| Score(+) | 0 | 13 | DATUM | 13 | |
| Score(-) | 4 | 31 | DATUM | 35 | |
| Total | -4 | -18 | DATUM | -22 |
5.1 Justification for scores given
| Design no | Objective | Score allocated | Justification for the score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Ease of use | 0 | It is easy to use just as the datum |
| Ease of portability | 0 | It is easily portable because of compact size like the datum | |
| Indicating machine On/Off | 0 | It has indicator similar to datum | |
| Works 24/7 | 0 | It can work for 24 hours | |
| Semi automatic | 0 | It is semi-automatic since paper has to be put as input from user | |
| Safety | 0 | It is safe to use just like the datum | |
| Cost | - | It is little costlier than datum | |
| Aesthetically pleasing | 0 | It is aesthetic like the datum | |
| 02 | Ease of use | + | It is easier to use compared to the datum |
| Ease of portability | -- | It is not easily portable because of it's bigger size | |
| Indicating machine On/Off | - | It does not have indicator | |
| Works 24/7 | 0 | It can work for 24 hours | |
| Semi automatic | 0 | It is semi-automatic since paper has to be put as input from user | |
| Safety | - | It is less safer to use because of it's open design | |
| Cost | 0 | It costs same as the datum | |
| Aesthetically pleasing | + | It is aesthetically pleasing | |
| 04 | Ease of use | + | It is easier to use compared to the datum |
| Ease of portability | -- | It is not easily portable because of it's bigger size | |
| Indicating machine On/Off | - | It does not have indicator | |
| Works 24/7 | 0 | It can work for 24 hours | |
| Semi automatic | 0 | It is semi-automatic since paper has to be put as input from user | |
| Safety | - | It is less safer to use because of it's open design | |
| Cost | - | It is costlier than the datum | |
| Aesthetically pleasing | + | It is aesthetically pleasing |
5.2 Selected design

5.3 Function clustering

5.4 Interaction between subsystems
Subsystem 1 = Paper handling unit
Subsystem 2 = Glue handling unit
Subsystem 3 = Indicating unit
| Paper handling unit | Glue handling unit | Indicating unit |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | NO | NO |
| Data | YES | NO |
| Material | NO | NO |
| Glue handling unit | Paper handling unit | Indicating unit |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | NO | YES |
| Data | YES | NO |
| Material | NO | NO |
| Indicating unit | Glue handling unit | Paper handling unit |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial | YES | NO |
| Data | NO | NO |
| Material | NO | NO |