Analysis: Causes of Variation in CsvFileProcessingPriority.processGraphByBreadthFirst Results

Context

• The system uses an entity-relationship graph (JGraphT) to represent JPA entities and their relationships.
• The CsvFileProcessingPriority class computes priorities for entities, using a breadth-first traversal of this graph.
• Five rounds of output show significant variation in the computed priorities or counts for each entity.

Key Observations

• The order and values for entities change significantly between runs.
• The process relies on traversing a graph of entities where each entity is a vertex, and relationships (edges) may have weights.

Main Causes of Variation

1. Unordered Data Structures

• The order in which vertices are stored and traversed is determined by the underlying graph or collection implementation.
• If unordered structures (like HashSet) are used for the vertex set, iteration order is not guaranteed and may change between runs.
• This leads to different starting points and traversal sequences, resulting in different priority calculations.

2. Non-Deterministic Graph Construction

• If the graph is built dynamically (e.g., via reflection, metamodel scanning, or classpath scanning), the order of entity discovery and addition may vary.
• This can lead to different graph shapes or edge directions between runs if not carefully controlled.

3. Edge Weight and Attribute Discovery

• Edge weights (1 or 2) are assigned based on field annotations (@NotNull, @NotBlank, etc.).
• If annotation processing or field discovery order is non-deterministic, the graph's weights can differ between executions.

4. Parallelism or Threading

• If any processing is done in parallel or with multiple threads, and if shared data structures are not synchronized or ordered, results may vary.

5. Breadth-First Traversal Parent Assignment

• The parent chosen for a node during breadth-first traversal depends on the order in which neighbors are visited.
• If neighbor order is not fixed, parent assignments (and thus priority propagation) can be inconsistent.

Recommendations for Determinism

Problem	Solution
Unordered collections	Use ordered structures (LinkedHashSet, etc)
Dynamic, unordered discovery	Sort entities before adding to the graph
Field/attribute discovery	Sort fields by name before processing
Edge/weight assignment	Ensure annotation processing is ordered

Summary Table

Cause	Manifestation in Results	Fix/Recommendation
Unordered vertex set/graph	Different entity order per round	Use ordered collections/graphs
Dynamic, unordered entity discovery	Entities appear/disappear/reorder	Sort entities before processing
Non-deterministic edge/relationship order	Variations in parent assignments	Consistently build/traverse graph

Direct Answer

The main cause of the variation is the use of unordered data structures for the entity graph and its traversal. This introduces non-determinism in the traversal order, leading to different results on each run. To fix this, use ordered collections and ensure the graph and all its construction steps are deterministic.

---

For further diagnosis or code adjustment examples, just request!