Context

Following up on some questions that came up in the meeting/over email from the last day.
In particular, I have an updated three panel plot showing the effects of the k-corrections. I also have some plots trying to break down the mass difference (between K-band and W1/W2 based methods) into a variety of slices/panels/views.

Diagnostics

This is a very brief update, but was asked about in the email exchange:
- I created a version of the K-Correction plot which splits the effect of the K-Correction into panels showing the K/W1 magntiude (top), the W1-W2 color (middle), and the net effect on the stellar mass inferred from each method (bottom panel). This is an extension of Figure 4 in the Overleaf, and looks like this:

KCorr Panels

Now here's the fun bit -- I've tried visualizing the difference in masses as a function of redshift and stellar mass in a variety of ways. This first set of plots are new views for the "fiducial" Cluver case, but I've included all versions in the next section. Qualitatively they're all quite similar.
First, here's the fiducial Cluver+14_Clipped case vs. the LM24 relation.
- The first and second plot are showing the mass difference for all galaxies as a function of redshift and as a function of K-band mass.
- The next two panels break down the results into 4 redshift bins and 4 mass bins so you can more carefully tease out the dependence.
- At least to my eye, the "All vs. z, Broken into M* bins" is most striking.
  - At least when I bin the data in this way, it seems like splitting the data into mass bins and plotting as a function of redshift reveals mostly a mass-dependent correction. It seems like these data are roughly "constant" versus redshift, but the amplitude of this constant increases with increasing mass.
  - This is further reinforced looking at the panel where the data are split into redshift bins, all of which have approximately the same fit line.

All vs. z	All vs. M*	All vs. M*, Broken into redshift bins	All vs. z, Broken into M* bins

Here's a different version of the same data that I'm quite fond of. In each of these plots, I'm showing two panels:
- In each panel, I divide the data into a bunch of bins defined by redshift and stellar mass, and I compute the mass difference (and standard deviation) in these bins.
- The left panel shows the mean difference for galaxies in that (M*, z) bin, and the right panel shows the number of galaxies inside of that bin.
- I've included a second set of plots showing the standard deviation of the mass difference in that bin for an idea of the "spread" of differences inside that cell.
- At least to my eye, it seems like the M* dependnece is a bit stronger than the redshfit dependence?