5. Concept evaluation and product architecture - I-Division-2021-2022-Even/Repo-15 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

630af874-b0a1-422e-8399-aee3d2759853 fd0e500f-0982-4979-b467-2ffa7301199a

5.1 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SCORE GIVEN

Design no. Objective Score Justification
1 Box should be semi automatic datum
1 Box should be able to store valuable things like jewellery datum
1 Box should be portable datum
1 Box should be light in weight datum
1 Box should have a puzzle to unlock datum
1 Box should be user friendly datum
1 Puzzle should be attached to the box datum
1 Puzzle box should run on continuous power supply datum
2 Box should be semi automatic 9 it is comparatively more automatic than datum
2 Box should be able to store valuable things like jewellery 0 it has same storage as datum
2 Box should be portable 7 it is more compact and easily portable than datum
2 Box should be light in weight 5 it is less in weight than datum
2 Box should have a puzzle to unlock 9 it has a better puzzle than datum
2 Box should be user friendly 0 it is as user friendly as datum
2 Puzzle should be attached to the box 0 both datum and this has attached puzzle
2 Puzzle box should run on continuous power supply 0 both run on continuous power supply
3 Box should be semi automatic 18 it is highly semiautomatic when compared to datum
3 Box should be able to store valuable things like jewellery 6 it has better storage capacity than datum
3 Box should be portable 7 it has more portability than datum
3 Box should be light in weight -5 it is a bit heavier than datum due to more separate compartment
3 Box should have a puzzle to unlock 18 it has a better puzzle than datum
3 Box should be user friendly 14 it is very user friendly when compared to datum
3 Puzzle should be attached to the box 0 both datum and this has attached puzzle
3 Puzzle box should run on continuous power supply 0 both run on continuous power supply
4 Box should be semi automatic 9 it is more semi automatic than datum
4 Box should be able to store valuable things like jewellery -6 it has sell storage capacity when compared to datum
4 Box should be portable -7 it is less portable due to separate puzzle
4 Box should be light in weight -5 it is bit heavy due to the type of puzzle
4 Box should have a puzzle to unlock -9 the puzzle is not as good as datum
4 Box should be user friendly 7 the box is more user friendly when compared to datum
4 Puzzle should be attached to the box -10 the puzzle is not attached to the box
4 Puzzle box should run on continuous power supply 0 both datum and this run on continuous power supply

5.2 SELECTED DESIGN

2f9c3bc5-4ed9-4659-a04d-b6285c412754

5.3 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE

5.4 FUNCTION CLUSTERING

5c18969e-8aad-458a-a538-0f0330cb07c3

5.5 INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

Subsystem list

Sl no. Subsystem
1. Casing
2. Puzzle Solving Unit
3. Opening/Closing Unit

Interaction Details

Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3
Spatial Yes Yes
Data - -
Material Yes Yes

.

Subsystem 2 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 3
Spatial Yes -
Data - Yes
Material Yes -

.

Subsystem 3 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2
Spatial Yes -
Data - Yes
Material Yes -