05. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - I-DIV-2024-25-EVEN/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

Design Objectives Weights Design 1 Design 2 Design 3 Design 4
User friendly 9 (++) DATUM (-) (-)
Energy efficient 7 (+) DATUM (+) (+)
Portability 5 (-) DATUM (-) (-)
Durability 6 (+) DATUM (+) (-)
Cost effective 6 (+) DATUM (-) (-)
Score(+) 37 13 7
Score(-) 5 20 26
Total 32 0 -7 -19

JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORE

Design No. Objective Score Allocated Justification for the Score
1 User friendly (++) Easy to operate with minimal effort
Energy efficient (+) Consumes relatively low power
Portability (-) Not easy to transport
Durability (+) Strong and reliable build
Cost effective (+) Uses affordable materials
2 User friendly DATUM USED AS REFERENCE
Energy efficient DATUM USED AS REFERENCE
Portability DATUM USED AS REFERENCE
Durability DATUM USED AS REFERENCE
Cost effective DATUM USED AS REFERENCE
3 User friendly (-) Complicated interface
Energy efficient (+) Moderate energy consumption
Portability (-) Difficult to move
Durability (+) Fairly durable not not the best
Cost effective (-) Expensive due to high components
4 User friendly (-) Not easy to understand and use
Energy efficient (+) Uses power efficiently
Portability (-) Not designed for frequent movement
Durability (-) Less durable compared to other designs
Cost effective (-) High cost

FUNCTION CLUSTERING

WhatsApp Image 2025-06-11 at 19 51 56_203e5414

INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

SUBSYSTEM LIST

SL. No. Subsystem
1 Power Unit
2 Handling Unit
3 Indication Unit

INTERACTION DETAILS

Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3
Spatial YES NO
Data YES YES
Material NO NO
Subsystem 2 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 3
Spatial YES YES
Data YES YES
Material YES NO
Subsystem 3 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2
Spatial NO YES
Data YES YES
Material NO NO