05. CONCEPT EVALUATION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - I-DIV-2024-25-EVEN/Repo-14 GitHub Wiki

PUGH CHART

Design Objectives	Weights	Design 1	Design 2	Design 3	Design 4
User friendly	9	(++)	DATUM	(-)	(-)
Energy efficient	7	(+)	DATUM	(+)	(+)
Portability	5	(-)	DATUM	(-)	(-)
Durability	6	(+)	DATUM	(+)	(-)
Cost effective	6	(+)	DATUM	(-)	(-)
Score(+)		37	—	13	7
Score(-)		5	—	20	26
Total		32	0	-7	-19

JUSTIFICATION FOR SCORE

Design No.	Objective	Score Allocated	Justification for the Score
1	User friendly	(++)	Easy to operate with minimal effort
	Energy efficient	(+)	Consumes relatively low power
	Portability	(-)	Not easy to transport
	Durability	(+)	Strong and reliable build
	Cost effective	(+)	Uses affordable materials
2	User friendly	DATUM	USED AS REFERENCE
	Energy efficient	DATUM	USED AS REFERENCE
	Portability	DATUM	USED AS REFERENCE
	Durability	DATUM	USED AS REFERENCE
	Cost effective	DATUM	USED AS REFERENCE
3	User friendly	(-)	Complicated interface
	Energy efficient	(+)	Moderate energy consumption
	Portability	(-)	Difficult to move
	Durability	(+)	Fairly durable not not the best
	Cost effective	(-)	Expensive due to high components
4	User friendly	(-)	Not easy to understand and use
	Energy efficient	(+)	Uses power efficiently
	Portability	(-)	Not designed for frequent movement
	Durability	(-)	Less durable compared to other designs
	Cost effective	(-)	High cost

FUNCTION CLUSTERING

INTERACTION BETWEEN SUBSYSTEMS

SUBSYSTEM LIST

SL. No.	Subsystem
1	Power Unit
2	Handling Unit
3	Indication Unit

INTERACTION DETAILS

Subsystem 1	Subsystem 2	Subsystem 3
Spatial	YES	NO
Data	YES	YES
Material	NO	NO

Subsystem 2	Subsystem 1	Subsystem 3
Spatial	YES	YES
Data	YES	YES
Material	YES	NO

Subsystem 3	Subsystem 1	Subsystem 2
Spatial	NO	YES
Data	YES	YES
Material	NO	NO