Business Questions - G33-Moviles-2026-1/Wiki GitHub Wiki
Type 1 — App telemetry
-
Which feature/flow has the highest crash rate (crashes per 1,000 sessions)?
Rationale/decision: prioritize hotfixes where the app fails most and improves perceived stability.
-
On which screens/actions does response time exceed the target threshold during peak hours?
Rationale/decision: optimize “few taps / fast discovery” when users are walking and in a hurry.
Type 2 — Direct user experience improvement
-
For a user near a building (or with approximate location), what are the top N “Available now” rooms ordered by estimated walking time, including the room status last-updated timestamp?
Rationale/decision: reduces wandering time and increases trust with timestamps.
-
For a user, which available rooms match a specific gap based on capacity/equipment?
Rationale/decision: turns the users needs into actionable recommendations (“My gaps and intentions” → “Recommended Rooms”).
-
For each room shown as available, what is its reliability level (e.g., Scheduled Free, User-validated, Conflicting reports) and when was it last validated?
Rationale/decision: delivers direct value by making uncertainty visible and increasing user confidence (instead of “accuracy” only for analytics).
-
For a specific room, which verifiable utilities does it have: equipment (projector/computer), power outlets/chargers availability, space type, Big tables?
Rationale/decision: supports fast decisions for studying/resting/group work without “insider knowledge”.
Type 3 — Feature analysis
-
Which filters (building, floor, capacity, equipment) are applied most often, and in what sequence (e.g., building → capacity → equipment)?
Rationale/decision: simplify UI (defaults, quick filters) and reduce taps when users are in a rush.
-
What characteristics do the most favorited rooms share (building/location, capacity, equipment, proximity to frequently visited class buildings, real availability history)?
Rationale/decision: improve recommendations (stronger priors) and suggest “similar rooms” that actually help users.
-
What is the most common way users upload/import their schedule (Google/Apple Calendar sync, ICS/PDF file, manual), and which method has the highest drop-off by step?
Rationale/decision: invest in the winning method and remove friction in the losing one (permissions, formats, UX).
-
What percentage of users rely on Recommended Rooms (location + gaps) vs manual search, and which path reaches “room selected” faster (time to success)?
Rationale/decision: validate whether the recommendation engine reduces time/stress or needs recalibration.
Type 4 — Benefits from data
-
Where are the demand hotspots (searches/views/intent-to-reserve) by building + time window, and how do they compare to official occupancy?
Rationale/decision: identify overcrowding, rebalance resources, and inform space policies.
-
Which are the most used tags (chilling, studing, teaching) in bookings (by building + time window)?
Rationale/decision: identify the common ways in which the rooms are being used.
Type 5
-
Where in the app do students spend the most time browsing?
Rationale/decision: identify most used screens on the app so they can be used to put adds and the dev team can shift the GUI to benefit that functionality or others.
-
How does the use of personalized room recommendations influence navigation efficiency and repeat usage under different contextual conditions (peak hours vs. off-peak)?
Rationale/decision: evaluate whether personalized recommendations improve efficiency and repeat usage to decide if the team should prioritize, adjust, or reduce investment in the recommendation engine based on contextual performance.