| Design 1 |
Safety |
-- |
Complex system makes it less user friendly |
|
Ease of use |
0 |
Has almost same physical dimensions as datum |
|
Portability |
- |
Use of materials(aquatic)wont work |
|
Use of standard parts |
0 |
It's mechanisms are almost same as datum |
|
Cost |
- |
It requires more space and contains parts which are difficult to install |
|
Maintenance |
+ |
It requires less maintenance than datum |
| Design 2 |
Safety |
+ |
Simple system makes it better than datum in terms of user friendly |
|
Ease of use |
0 |
Has almost same physical dimensions as datum |
|
Portability |
+ |
Simple system and musical instrument makes it more aesthetic than datum |
|
Use of standard parts |
++ |
continuous spraying of water and sound makes it more effective |
|
Cost |
- |
It requires more space and contains parts which are difficult to install |
|
Maintenance |
0 |
It has same components as datum |
| Design 3 |
Safety |
+ |
It's easy to use compared to datum |
|
Ease of use |
0 |
It is same datum |
|
Portability |
- |
The complex system makes it look dull |
|
Use of standard parts |
-- |
it less effective |
|
Cost |
+ |
It's design is same as datum |
|
Maintenance |
0 |
It has same number of components as datum |
| Design 4 |
Safety |
Datum |
|
|
Ease of use |
Datum |
|
|
Portability |
Datum |
|
|
Use f standard parts |
Datum |
|
|
Cost |
Datum |
|
|
Maintenance |
Datum |
|